Malaria kills 880,000 people a year -- that’s 100 people an hour, 80 of them young children in sub-Saharan Africa.
Pesticide Action Network has been working with international allies, governments and on-the-ground groups in Africa for many years to mobilize resources and political will to combat this deadly disease.
Solutions do exist. They are community-based, integrated solutions already at work in places as diverse as Mexico, Kenya and Vietnam. Successful malaria control programs have been built all over the world using a variety of approaches that share four common traits: community involvement, appropriate technology, public health education and a recognition that the costs of DDT outweigh its benefits.
COSTS & FAILURES OF DDT
DDT fails as a public health tool for the same reasons it was banned as an agricultural pesticide in the 1970s. The costs are too high and impossible to control:
• Health effects: Studies show that DDT is a neurodevelopmental and reproductive toxin that is especially dangerous to infants and children. DDT has been linked to low sperm count in men, certain forms of cancer and diabetes.
• Resistance: The effectiveness of DDT continues to decline as more and mosquito populations develop resistance.
• Stockpiles: 100,000+ tons of obsolete pesticides like DDT are stockpiled in Africa with no means of disposal.
• Bioaccumulation: DDT and its breakdown product, DDE, persist for many years, travel the world, and accumulate in the global food chain.
• Dirty production: DDT production plants contaminate the environment and put local communities at risk wherever they are produced.
Communities facing malaria, which disproportionately affects poor and undernourished areas, should not have to also face the long-term health risks posed by exposure to DDT when safe and affordable solutions are available. What countries fighting malaria need is strong support for effective, safe and affordable solutions that invest in community resources over the long term.
TREATY MANDATES DDT PHASEOUT
The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) is an international treaty calling for the elimination of hazardous chemicals that persist in the environment and in our bodies, and travel the world in water and on air. DDT is among the original twelve chemicals targeted for global phaseout by the POPs treaty, with exemptions for countries where controlling disease vectors (like mosquitos) are necessary and “locally safe, effective and affordable alternatives are not available”.
163 governments from around the world are party to this legally binding treaty (the U.S. is not among them). PAN International and its allies join these governments in calling for a redoubling of investment in safe, effective and affordable malaria control.
PAN International DDT Statement: Supporting Safe and Effective Strategies without DDT In English En Fracais
US partner statement on : Safe Malaria Solutions
This compilation of articles will be updated periodically and it is by no means comprehensive. The articles are arranged by category and in chronological order with the newest studies first. We hope it will prove to be a useful tool in the ongoing discussion among policymakers, advocacy groups and the media regarding the use of DDT and the need to improve efforts to effectively control malaria.
For detailed information on the toxicity, health effects and regulatory status of DDT, visit PANNA's on-line Pesticide Database.
PANNA Summary:
Abstract: Until the 1990sthe 1,1,1-trichloro-bis-2,2′-(4chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT) was sprayedin the walls of the house along the Madeira River basin, BrazilianAmazon, a region well known for its large number of malaria cases. In1910, Oswaldo Cruz described the presence of malaria in 100% of thepopulation living in some localities from the Madeira River basin. Dataavailable in the literature point to the DDT contamination in fishescaptured in Madeira River region. Fish is the major source of dietaryprotein to these people. DDT tends to accumulate in lipid rich tissuesand is being eliminated by different events, including lactation.Considering the importance of feeding breast milk to the children, theassociated risks of DDT exposure via breast milk intake to childrenmust be assessed. This is the main objective of this work: to analysethe presence of the p,p′-DDT and its metabolites p,p′-DDE and p,p′-DDD in 69 human milk samples and to estimate the intake of DDT and its metabolite in terms of total DDT (total DDT = p,p′-DDE + p,p′-DDD + p,p′-DDT).All the samples showed contamination with DDT and its metabolitesranging from 25.4 to 9361.9 ng of total DDT/g of lipid(median = 369.6 ng of total DDT/g of lipid) and 8.7% of the estimateddaily intake (EDI), in terms of total DDT, which was higher than theacceptable daily intake proposed by the WHO.
Bouwman H, Sereda B, and Meinhardt H.M. Simultaneous presence of DDTand pyrethroid residues in human breast milk from a malaria endemicarea in South Africa. Environmental Pollution 2006 114: 902-917
PANNA Summary: Human breast milk is a known to be the bestsource of nutrition for infants. In developing countries, especially inthe rural areas it is the primary source of food to infants sometimesuntil the age of 2, which is a particularly long period and can lead toa significant transfer of pollutants. In Africa, malaria kills millionseach year even today. The use of pesticides for vector controlcontinues to rely on insecticide treated bed nets and residualspraying. While the Stockholm convention and Rollback malaria campaigncontinues to work towards reducing the reliance on malaria, it wasforced to reintroduce DDT in South Africa. Also, malaria is not theonly potential source of human exposure to pesticides. Pyrethroids,organophosphates and carbamates, etc., are now readily used in cropprotection and veterinary chemicals. The aim of this study is toinvestigate and deliberate on the presence of DDT and other pyrethroidsin breast milk of three semi-urban populations. Results indicate thatDDT levels were lower than found in previous studies but the presenceof pyrethroids has added to another level of complexity. It shows thatmore work is required in this aspect. The author does stress that thereis no reason to implicate breastfeeding as a primary source ofnutrition in infants.
Abstract: DDT and pyrethroids were determined in 152 breast-milksamples from three towns in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, one of whichhad no need for DDT for malaria control. All compounds were foundpresent in breast milk. Primiparae from one town had the highest meanSDDT whole milk levels (238.23 mg/l), and multiparae from the same townhad the highest means for permethrin (14.51 mg/l), cyfluthrin(41.74mg/l), cypermethrin (4.24 mg/l), deltamethrin (8.39 mg/l), andpyrethroid (31.5 mg/l), most likely derived from agriculture. The ADIfor DDTwas only exceeded by infants from one town, but the ADI forpyrethroids was not exceeded. Since the ADI for DDT was recentlyreduced from 20 to 10 mg/kg/bw, we suggest that this aspect be treatedwith concern. We therefore raise a concern based on toxicantinteractions, due to the presence of four different pyrethroids andDDT. Breastfeeding however, remains safe under prevailing conditions.
PANNA Summary: The authors examine the relationship betweenDDTspraying for malaria control and preterm births and shorterdurations of lactation in sub-Saharan Africa. They estimated theincrease in infant deaths that may have resulted from DDT spraying andmake the claim that the same amount of children may be dying from DDTas being saved by it for malaria control.
Abstract: Although dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethane (DDT) isbeing banned worldwide, countries in sub-Saharan Africa have soughtexemptions for malaria control. Few studies show illness in childrenfrom the use of DDT, and the possibility of risks to them from DDT usehas been minimized. However, plausible if inconclusive studiesassociate DDT with more preterm births and shorter duration oflactation, which raise the possibility that DDT does indeed have suchtoxicity. Assuming that these associations are causal, we estimated theincrease in infant deaths that might result from DDT spraying. Theestimated increases are of the same order of magnitude as the decreasesfrom effective malaria control. Unintended consequences of DDT use needto be part of the discussion of modern vector control policy.
PANNA summary: The authors found that DDE (a metabolite of DDT)levels in the breast milk of mothers in an agricultural town innorthern Mexico is strongly linked to the length of time that theybreastfeed their infants. Mothers with the highest levels of DDEbreastfed for only 3 months on average, while mothers with the lowestDDE levels breastfed for an average of 7.5 months. The authors concludethat DDT exposure may be contributing to the trend toward decreasinglengths of lactation world wide.
Abstract: Objectives: Worldwide declines in the duration oflactation are cause for public health concern. Higher levels ofdichlorodiphenyldichloroethene (DDE) have been associated with shorterdurations of lactation in the United States. This study examinedwhether this relationship would hold in an agricultural town innorthern Mexico.
Methods: Two hundred twenty-nine women were followed every 2 monthsfrom childbirth until weaning or until the child reached 18 monthsofage. DDE was measured in breast milk samples taken at birth, andwomen were followed to see how long they lactated.
Results: Median duration was 7.5 months in the lowest DDE group and 3months in the highest. The effect was confined to those who hadlactated previously, and it persisted after statistical adjustment forother factors. These results are not due to overtly sick children beingweaned earlier. Previous lactation lowers DDE levels, which produces anartifactual association, but simulations using best estimate show thatan effect as large as that found here would arise through thismechanism only 6% of the time.
Conclusions: DDE may affect women's ability to lactate. This exposuremay be contributing to lactation failure throughout the world.(Statistics and Biomathematics Branch,National Institute ofEnvironmental Health Sciences, Mail Drop A3-03POB 12233, ResearchTriangle Park, NC 27709, USA.)
PANNA summary: This is a study of the levels of DDT and itsmetabolites in the blood of infants and the breast milk of theirmothers in KwaZulu, South Africa where DDT is used to control malaria.It was found that breastfeeding is the primary source of DDT in babies'blood, and that it accumulates with age. DDT in the environment is asecondary source.
Abstract: The transfer ofp,p'-DDT(1,1,1-tricholoro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane) and itsmetabolites to infants via breast-feeding was studied in an area ofKwaZulu, SouthAfrica, where DDT is used to interrupt malariatransmission. Samples of whole blood were collected from 23 infants,together with samples of breast milk from their respective mothers. Themean sigma DDT (totalDDT) in the whole blood was 127.03 micrograms. l-1and that in the breast milk, 15.06 mg.kg-1 (milk fat). The % DDT (% DDTof sigma DDT) was significantly higher in the infant blood than in thebreast milk (less than 0.05). A multiplicative regression analysisindicated that sigma DDT increased significantly (P less than 0.01) ininfant wholeblood with infant age. Multiple regression showed that70.0% of the variation in sigma DDT was due to the variation in parityof the mother, age of the infant, and the sigma DDT in breast milk.These variables accounted also for 76.3% of the variation in p,p'-DDEbut only for 38.2% of that in p,p'-DDT. Organochlorines were thereforelargely transferred to the infant from the mother, with DDT in theenvironment playing a secondary role. (Department of Zoology,Universityfor Christian Higher Education, Potchefstroom, South Africa.)
PANNA summary: This study determined the effects of PCBs and DDE(DDTmetabolite) in breast milk on infant growth and health. Its mostsignificant finding was that higher levels of DDE are associated withmarkedly shorter duration of breast feeding, indicating that DDE issomehow interfering with mothers’ ability to breastfeed their children.
Abstract: We followed 858 children from birth to one year of ageto determine whether the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)anddichlorodiphenyl dichloroethene (DDE) in breast milk affected theirgrowth or health. Neither chemical showed an adverse effect on weightor frequency of physician visits for various illnesses, althoughdifferences were seen between breast-fed and bottle-fed children, withbottle-fed children being heavier and having more frequentgastroenteritis and otitis media. Children of mothers with higherlevels of DDE were breast-fed for markedly shorter times, butadjustments for possible confounders and biases did not change thefindings. In absence of any apparent effect on the health of thechildren, we speculate that DDE may be interfering with the mother'sability to lactate, possibly because of its estrogenic properties.
DDT Exposure, Work in Agriculture and Time to Pregnancy Among Farmworkers in California, Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine 50 (12):1335-42, December 2008
PANNA Summary:Abstract: Objective: This study examined whether exposure topesticides, including dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), wasassociated with longer time to pregnancy (TTP).
Methods: Pregnant women (N 402) living in a migrant farmworkercommunity were asked how many months they took to conceive. Womenreported their and their partners’ occupational and home pesticideexposure preceding conception.
In a subset (N 289), levels of DDT and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), were measured in maternal serum.
Results: No associations were seen with p,-DDT, o, p-DDT, or p, p-DDE.Maternal occupational pesticide exposure (fecundability odds ratios[fOR]0.8, 95% CI: 0.6 to 1.0), home pesticide use (fOR0.6, 95% CI: 0.4to 0.9), and residence within 200 ft of an agricultural field (fOR 0.7,95% CI: 0.5 to 1.0) were associated with reduced fecundability (ie,longer TTP).
Conclusions: Longer TTP was seen among women, but not men, reporting exposure to agricultural and home pesticides.
Exposure of Mother - Child and Postpartum Woman - Infant Pairs to DDT and its Metabolites in Tianjin, China. Science of the Total Environment, April 2008
PANNA Summary: In this study, data gathered from mothers,postpartum woman and children was assayed. Levels of DDT in childrenwere seen to be higher than that in the women's. The finding indicate acumulative effect of DDT in the human body in Tianjin, China.
Abstract: 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT)exhibits its long persistence in the environment, unusualbioaccumulation, effects on wildlife, and the possibility of long-termadverse effects on human health, especially reproductivetoxicity.Despite the prohibition of most persistent organochlorinepesticides in China, the presence of organochlorine residue, includingDDT, has been widely indicated in environmental substance. However,scarce information is available about accumulative levels of DDT inhuman tissues in China. To evaluate levels of DDT and its potentialeffects on women and children's health in a Chinese pesticide- exposedarea, we recruited 50 pairs of mother–child and 50
postpartum women, and determined the levels of total DDT and its fourmain metabolites (p,p-DDE, p,p-DDT, p,p-DDD, o,p-DDT) in venous blood,breastmilk and umbilical blood cord by gas chromatography. Accordingly,data on reproductive outcomes of mothers and postpartum women andhealthy status of children and infants were gathered through aquestionnaire and medical examinations. Furthermore, we also assayedthe DDT levels of some environmental samples (soil, food, milk, etal.). The levels of DDT in children's blood were higher than that inthe women's. As compared to breast milk, the umbilical blood cord andthe ventral fat individually demonstrated a significantly lower andhigher level of DDT in the postpartum women. DDT was lower in milk andcrucian carp than in the soil near the chemical plant. p,p-DDT andp,p-DDE were the main metabolites of DDT. Our findings suggested thecumulative effect of DDT in human body in Tianjin, China.
PANNA Summary: This study found associations of DDT and DDE, abreakdown of DDT, associated with abnormal sperm, impaired spermmovement, and low ejaculate volume in semen from healthy men aged 18-40who live in an area in South Africa where DDT is sprayed every year.Theresults imply that non-occupational exposure to DDT is associated withimpaired semen in men. The high exposure levels of DDT and DDE are ofconcern, as these levels may have far reaching implications forreproductive and general health.
Abstract: The pesticideDDT[1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(chlorodiphenyl)ethane] is one of the 12persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that were under negotiation at theStockholm Convention, to restrict or ban their production and usebecause of to their toxicity, resistance to breakdown, bioaccumulationand potential for being transported over long distances. DDT hasestrogenic potential and the main metabolite p,p'-DDE is a potentanti-androgen. In response to mounting evidence on the endocrinedisrupting influence of environmental chemicals on human health, thisepidemiological study was initiated to test the hypothesis thatnon-occupational exposure to DDT affects male reproductive parameters.In a cross sectional study healthy male subjects (n=311) aged between18and 40 years (23±5) were recruited from three communities in anendemicmalaria area where DDT is sprayed annually. A semen analysis accordingto the World Health Organization (WHO)(1999) standards was performed.The Hamilton Thorne Computer Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA)system wassimultaneously used to determine additional sperm motility parameters.Blood plasma samples were assayed for p,p'-DDT and metabolites as ameasure of exposure. The exposure levels were expressed as lipidadjusted p,p'-DDT and p,p'-DDE values. The mean p,p’-DDT and p,p'-DDEconcentrations were 90.23 µg/g (±102.4) and215.47 µg/g (±210.6),respectively. The multivariate linear regression analyses indicatedthat: the mean CASA motility was lower with a higher p,p'-DDEconcentration (beta = -0.02; p=0.001) and the CASA parameter,beat crossfrequency (BCF)was higher with a higher p,p'-DDT concentration (beta=0.01; p =0.000). There was also a statistically significantly positiveassociation between the percentage sperm with cytoplasmic droplets andp,p’-DDT concentration(beta =0.0014; p=0.014). The ejaculate volume(mean:1.9±1.33mL) was lower than the normal range ( 2.0mL)for the WHO,and a significant decrease with increasing p,p'-DDE values was seen forboth square rooted volume(beta=-0.0003; p= 0.024) and count (beta=-0.003; p= 0.04). Although there were no associations between eitherp,p'-DDT or p,p'-DDE concentrations and the rest of the seminalparameters, the incidence of teratozoospermia (% Normal sperm <15%)(99%) was high. Twenty-eight percent of the study group presented witholigo zoospermia (< 20million sperm/mL) which had a significantlypositive association with p,p'-DDE (OR:1.001; p = 0.03). There was asignificantly positive association between participants withasthenozoospermia (32%) andp,p'-DDT (OR:1.003, p = 0.006) and p,p'-DDE(OR:1.001, p = 0.02). The results imply that non-occupational exposureto DDT is associated with impaired seminal parameters in men. The highexposure levels ofp,p'-DDT and p,p'-DDE are of concern, as these levelsmay have far reaching implications for reproductive and general health.
Full text: http://www.andrologyjournal.org/cgi/rapidpdf/jandrol.106.001701v1
PANNA Summary: This study examines male reproductive developmentoffour groups of rats, a control group and three groups givenpesticide-laced serums, including DDT. The rats were exposed inuteroand then given the serum for 10 weeks after birth. The ratsexposed topesticides did not develop as well as the control group andthe findings that exposure to endocrine disrupting compounds maycontribute to the deterioration of male reproductive health.
Abstract: Many reports suggest that male reproductive health hasdeteriorated over the last decades, possibly due to environmentalcontaminants that act as endocrine disruptors. This hypothesis wastested in Sprague-Dawley rats using a modified Organization forEconomic Cooperation and Development 415 one-generation test. Group Areceived cottonseed oil as control, and Groups B, C and D receiveddeltamethrin (DM); DM and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT); andDM,DDT, phytoestrogens and p-nonylphenol, respectively. Rats were exposedin utero and then received the substances for 10 weeks. The seminalvesicle mass (Group B; P = 0.046) and sperm count [Groups C (P= 0.013)and D (P = 0.003)] were lower and the anogenital distance[Group B (P =0.047) C (P = 0.045) and D (P = 0.002)] shorter compared with thecontrol group. The seminiferous tubule diameter [Groups B (P=<0.001), C (P = <0.001) and D (P = <0.001)] and epitheliumthickness [Groups B (P = 0.030), C (P = <0.001) and D (P=<0.001)] were smaller compared with the control. The histologyofthe testes showed signs of apical sloughing and vacuolisation.Liverweights [Groups C (P = 0.013) and D (P = 0.005)] and liverenzymes[Group D (P = 0.013)] were also affected. These findings mayindicate that simultaneous exposure to endocrine disrupting compoundscontributes to the deterioration observed in male reproductive health.
PANNA Summary: This detailed study examines the exposure of 11organochlorine pesticides as assessed by measurements in maternalserumis associated with shortened length of gestation and poorer fetalgrowth in a birth cohort from an agricultural community in theSalinasvalley, California. An association between increasing maternalHCB serum levels and decreased length of gestation was observed whereasan HCB associated decrease in crown-heel length as reported in aSpanish study by Ribas-Fito et al. 2000 was not found. Hence, eventhough there was no positive finding of an adverse association of inutero organochlorine pesticide exposure with birth weight or crown –heel length using maternal serum, the study did find that exposure toHCB was significantly related to a decrease in length of gestation.These results are not conclusive because of multiple comparisons. HCBis not manufactured anymore but is still produced as a byproduct due towhichit may still enter the environment and its potential reproductivetoxicity continues to remain as a concern for human populations.
Abstract: From 1940 through the 1970s, organochlorine compoundswere widely used as insecticides in the United States. Thereafter,their use was severely restricted after recognition of theirpersistence in the environment, their toxicity in animals, and theirpotential for endocrine disruption. Although substantial evidenceexists for the fetal toxicity of organochlorines in animals,information on human reproductive effects is conflicting. Weinvestigated whether infants' length of gestation, birth weight, andcrown-heel length were associated with maternal serum levels of 11different organochlorine pesticides: p,p-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (p,p -DDT),p,p-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (p,p -DDE),o,p-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (o,p -DDT), hexachlorobenzene(HCB),gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCCH),gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane(gamma-HCCH), dieldrin, heptachlor epoxide,oxychlordane,trans-nonachlor, and mirex. Our subjects were a birthcohort of 385 low-income Latinas living in the Salinas Valley, anagricultural community in California. We observed no adverseassociations between maternal serum organochlorine levels and birthweight or crown-heel length. We found decreased length of gestationwith increasing levels of lipid-adjusted HCB (adjusted gamma = -0.47weeks; p = 0.05). We did not find reductions in gestational durationassociated with any of the other organochlorine pesticides. Our findingof decreased length of gestation related to HCB does not seem to havehad clinical implications for this population, given its relatively lowrate of preterm delivery (6.5%). (Division of Environmental andOccupational Disease Control, California Department of Health Services,Richmond, CA94804, USA. lfenster@dhs.ca.gov)
PANNA Summary: This study shows an association of DDE withincreased amounts of Y chromosome bearing sperm in Swedish fisherman.These dataadd to the growing body of evidence that exposure topersistent organic pollutants may alter the offspring sex ratio.
Abstract: During the last decades, there has been concern thatexposure to endocrine disruptors, such as persistent organochlorinepollutants(POPs), may contribute to sex ratio changes in offspring ofexposed populations.
Methods: To investigate whether exposure to2,2'4,4'5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl (CB-153) anddichlorodiphenyldichloroethene (p,p'-DDE) affect Y:X chromosomeproportion, semen of149 Swedish fishermen, aged 27–67 years, wasinvestigated. The men provided semen and blood for analysis of hormone,CB-153 and p,p'-DDE levels. The proportion of Y- and X-chromosomebearing sperm in semen samples was determined by two-colourfluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH) analysis.
Results: Log transformed CB-153 as well as log transformed p,p'-DDEvariables were both significantly positively associated with Ychromosome fractions (P-values=0.05 and <0.001,respectively).Neither age, smoking, nor hormone levels showed any association withY-chromosome fractions.
Conclusions: This is the first study to indicate that exposure to POPsmay increase the proportion of ejaculated Y-bearing spermatozoa. Thesedata add to the growing body of evidence that exposure to POPs mayalter the offspring sex ratio.
FullText: http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/20/7/1903
PANNA Summary: The authors measured levels of DDT in 388 womenin China between 1996 and 1998. They measured DDT levels beforeconception and monitored early pregnancy losses and spontaneousabortions in the pregnancies. There was a positive relationship betweenpreconception DDT levels and the risk of subsequent early pregnancyloss.
Abstract: Previous studies of pregnancy losses and1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT) were limitedbecause they did not include losses prior to clinical detection ofpregnancy and because exposures were measured after the pregnancies ofinterest. The authors examined the association of preconception serumtotal DDT (sum of DDT isomers and metabolites) concentration andsubsequent pregnancy losses in 388 newly married, nonsmoking, femaletextile workers in China between 1996 and 1998. Upon stoppingcontraception, subjects provided daily urine specimens and records ofvaginal bleeding for up to 1 year or until clinical pregnancy. Dailyurinary human chorionic gonadotropin was assayed to detect conceptionand early pregnancy losses, and pregnancies were followed to detectclinical spontaneous abortions. There were 128 (26%) early pregnancylosses in 500 conceptions and 36 (10%) spontaneous abortions in 372clinical pregnancies. Subjects were grouped in tertiles bypreconception serum total DDT concentration (group 1: 5.5–22.9ng/g;group 2: 23.0–36.5 ng/g; group 3: 36.6– 113.3 ng/g). Compared withgroup 1, group 2 had adjusted relative odds of early pregnancy lossesof 1.23 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72, 2.10), and group 3 hadadjusted odds of 2.12 (95% CI: 1.26, 3.57). The relative odds of earlypregnancy losses associated with a 10-ng/g increase in serum total DDTwere 1.17 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.29). The small number of spontaneousabortions following clinical detection of pregnancy were not associatedwith serum total DDT. In this population, there was apositive,monotonic, exposure-response association between preconceptionserumtotal DDT and the risk of subsequent early pregnancy losses.
PANNA Summary: DDT and DDE were measured in serum samples fromwomen after delivery between 1960 and 1963. Then 28-31 years later thewomen’s eldest daughters recorded their time until pregnancy. Thedaughter’s chances of pregnancy fell with the increase of DDT in themother’s serum.
Abstract: Reproductive-tract anomalies after administration ofthe potent oestrogen, diethylstilboestrol, in pregnant women raisedconcerns about the reproductive effects of exposure to weaklyoestrogenic environmental contaminants suchasbis[4-chlorophenyl]-1,1,1-trichloroethane (p, p′-DDT) or itsmetabolites, such as bis[4-chlorophenyl]-1,1-dichloroethene (p,p′-DDE).We measured p, p′-DDT and p, p′-DDE in preserved maternal serum samplesdrawn 1–3 days after delivery between 1960 and 1963. We recorded timeto pregnancy in 289 eldest daughters 28–31 years later. Daughters'probability of pregnancy fell by 32% per 10 μg/L p, p′-DDTin maternalserum (95% CI 11–48). By contrast, the probability of pregnancyincreased 16% per 10 μg/L p, p-DDE (6·27). The decreased fecundabilityassociated with prenatal p, p′-DDT remains unexplained. We speculatethat the antiandrogenic activity of p, p -DDE may mitigate harmfulandrogen effects on the ovary during gestation or early life.Correspondence to: Dr Barbara A Cohn
PANNA Summary: This study examines the amounts of DDT and DDEinmother’s serum after delivery, and looks for associations betweentheselevels and the infants’ development using a standard developmentscale.The results show a relationship between lower psychomotordevelopment scores and increased DDT in the mothers’ serum. Thepopulation studied was Mexican American farm-workers and their childrenin California.
Abstract: Objective: We investigated the relationship betweenprenatal exposure to dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) anddichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) and neurodevelopment ofMexicanfarm-workers’ children in California.
Methods: Participants from the Center for the Health Assessment ofMothers and Children of Salinas study, a birth cohort study, included360 singletons with maternal serum measures of p,p_-DDT, o,p_-DDT,andp,p_-DDE. Psychomotor development and mental development wereassessed with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 6, 12, and 24months.
Results: We found a _2-point decrease in Psychomotor DevelopmentalIndex scores with each 10-fold increase in p,p_-DDT levels at 6 and 12months (but not 24 months) and p,p_-DDE levels at 6 months only. Wefound no association with mental development at 6 months but a 2- to3-point decrease in Mental Developmental Index scores for p,p-DDT ando,p-DDTat 12 and 24 months, corresponding to 7- to 10-point decreasesacross the exposure range. Even when mothers had substantialexposure,breastfeeding was usually associated positively with Bayleyscalescores.
Conclusions:Prenatal exposure to DDT, and to a lesser extent DDE, wasassociated with neurodevelopmental delays during early childhood,although breastfeeding was found to be beneficial even among women withhigh levels of exposure. Countries considering the use of DDT shouldweighits benefit in eradicating malaria against the negativeassociations found in this first report on DDT and humanneurodevelopment.
PANNA Summary: Exposure to DDT occurs both in utero and becauseof its lipophilicity, via breastfeeding. While animal studies haveindicated effects on brain growth due to DDT exposure, neurodevelopmentin humanis less documented. A study in 2005 reported higherconcentrations ofDDE in newborns in Menorca, Spain, than in the Riberad’Ebre cohort. This study is a follow up to the previous 2005 study toassess the association of cord serum levels of DDE and DDT withneurodevelopment at age 4 years. The results indicated that prenatalexposure to low level, concentrations of DDT and DDE at birth isassociated with a decrease in verbal, memory, and quantitative andperceptual performance skills among preschoolers. Hence, the authorsuggests that even though DDT is considered to be useful in malarialcontrol, the evidence of its adverse effects on health requires forappropriate research on its benefits versus its risks.
Abstract: p,p'-DDT (bis[p-chlorophenyl]-1,1,1-trichloroethane)is a persistent organochlorine compound that has been used worldwide asan insecticide. The authors evaluated the association of cord serumlevels of DDT and its metabolite, 2, 2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dichloroethylene (DDE), with neurodevelopment atage 4 years. Two birth cohorts in Ribera d'Ebre and Menorca (Spain)were recruited between 1997 and 1999 (n=475). Infants were assessed atage 4 years by using the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities.Organochlorine compounds were measured in cord serum. Children's dietand parental sociodemographic information was obtained throughquestionnaire.Results showed that DDT cord serum concentration at birthwas inversely associated with verbal, memory, quantitative, andperceptual-performance skills at age 4 years. Children whose DDTconcentrations in cord serum were >0.20 ng/ml had mean decreases of7.86 (standard error, 3.21) points in the verbal scale and10.86(standard error, 4.33) points in the memory scale when comparedwith children whose concentrations were <0.05 ng/ml. Theseassociations were stronger among girls. Prenatal exposure tobackground, low-level concentrations of DDT was associated with adecrease in preschoolers' cognitive skills. These results should beconsidered when evaluating the risk and benefits of spraying DDT duringantimalaria and other disease-vector campaigns. (Dr. Nu´ riaRibas-Fito´, Respiratory and Environmental Health Research Unit, IMIM,C. Doctor Aiguader 80, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain (e-mail: nribas@imim.es)
Sinha C, Seth K, Islam F, Chaturvedi RK, Shukla S, MathurN,Srivastava N, Agrawal AK. Behavioral and neurochemical effectsinducedby pyrethroid-based mosquito repellent exposure in rat offsprings during prenatal and early postnatal period. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 20064: 472-81.
PANNA Summary: Studies have shown that newborn babies, pregnantand lactating mothers are more prone to toxics when exposed topyrethroids used as mosquito repellants since they stay for longerdurations insidethe house. This pilot study found that prenatal,postnatal and perinatal exposure to pyrethroid-based Mosquitorepellants could alter blood brain barrier permeability. DevelopingCentral Nervous System hasbeen considered to be vulnerable to oxidativedamage brain region as compared to other brain regions. The rat pupsexposed to mosquito repellants clearly indicated significantinvolvement of the hippocampus. Overall, the study claims to stress onthe effect of pyerethroid based repellants on the neurochemical andbehavioral effects and implies that pregnant women and infants may begreatlyoffset by the benefits of the protection of repellants if theresult on rats are indicative of their effects.
Abstract: Synthetic pyrethroids, besides their use inagriculture,are prevalently used in our houses as mosquito repellent(MR) in the form of aerosol, mats, coils and liquid vaporizers.Inhalation of fumes of the MR/liquid vaporizers may get entry into thebrain by breaching the developing blood-brain barrier, hencedeleterious to developing nervous system and can lead to long-termfunctional deficits. In the present study the consequence of MRexposure has further been investigated at various stages ofdevelopment, evaluating free radical mediated effect pertinent toneurobehavioral and neurochemical functioning. Rat pups were exposed topyrethroid-based MR (allethrin3.6% w/v, 8 h/day through inhalation)during prenatal (GD1-20),postnatal (PND1-30) and perinatal (GD1-PND30)period of development and assessments were made on PND31. We observedsignificant oxidative stress, where an increase in lipid peroxidationand a decrease in antioxidants, glutathione, superoxide dismutase andcatalase in various brain areas (cerebellum, corpus striatum, frontalcortex andhippocampus) were evident at all the exposure schedules. Thehippocampus was the most affected region and further exhibited alteredcholinergic functioning in the form of significant decrease incholinergic (muscarinic) receptor binding (prenatal 32%, postnatal35%,perinatal 38%) and inhibition in acetylcholinesterase activity(prenatal 20%, postnatal 31% and perinatal 33%). The neurochemicalchanges were found to accompany decrease in learning and memoryperformance in exposed rats, the function governed by hippocampus. Theresult suggests that pyrethroid-based MR inhalation during earlydevelopmental period may have adverse effect on developing nervoussystem causing cholinergic dysfunction leading to learning and memorydeficit. (Developmental Toxicology Division, IndustrialToxicologyResearch Centre, Post Box-80, M.G. Marg Lucknow 226001,India. E-mailaddress: aka33@rediffmail.com (A.K. Agrawal)
PANNA summary: The study found that prenatal exposure to DDT,and to a lesser extent DDE, was related with neurodevelopmental delaysduring early childhood Mexican farm-workers' children in California. The authors thus urge countries considering the use of DDT to weigh itsbenefit in eradicating malaria against the negative associations.
Abstract: Objective: We investigated the relationship betweenprenatal exposure to dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) anddichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) and neurodevelopment of Mexicanfarm-workers' children in California.
Methods: Participants from the Center for the Health Assessment ofMothers and Children of Salinas study, a birth cohort study, included360 singletons with maternal serum measures of p,p'-DDT, o,p'-DDT, andp,p'-DDE. Psychomotor development and mental development were assessedwith the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 6, 12, and 24 months.
Results: We found a 2-point decrease in Psychomotor Developmental Indexscores with each 10-fold increase in p,p'-DDT levels at 6 and 12 months(but not 24 months) and p,p'-DDE levels at 6 months only. We found noassociation with mental development at 6 months but a 2- to 3-pointdecrease in Mental Developmental Index scores for p,p'-DDT and o,p'-DDTat 12 and 24 months, corresponding to 7- to 10-point decreases acrossthe exposure range. Even when mothers had substantial exposure,breastfeeding was usually associated positively with Bayley scalescores.
Conclusions: Prenatal exposure to DDT, and to a lesser extent DDE, wasassociated with neurodevelopmental delays during early childhood,although breastfeeding was found to be beneficial even among women withhigh levels of exposure. Countries considering the use of DDT shouldweigh its benefit in eradicating malaria against the negativeassociations found in this first report on DDT and humanneurodevelopment.
PANNA summary: This study found that retired malaria-controlworkers who had worked spraying DDT did worse on tests ofneurobehavioral functions than control groups, and that the longer theyhad worked with DDT, the poorer the test results. These resultsindicate that long-term exposure to DDT is measurably harmful.
Abstract: Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) is a compoundwith moderate toxicity that is judged to be safe for occupational use,although little is known about its long-term effects on the humannervous system. We investigated chronic nervous-system effects oflong-term occupational exposure to DDT by comparing the neurobehavioralperformance of retired malaria-control workers with a reference groupof retired guards and drivers. DDT-exposed workers did worse on testsassessing various neurobehavioral functions than controls; performancesignificantly deteriorated with increasing years of DDT application.Ourresults could not be explained by exposure to cholinesterase-inhibitingpesticides or other potential confounding factors.
DDT and Breast Cancer in Young Women: New Data on the Significance of Age at Exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives August 2007
PANNA Summary:
Abstract:
McGlynn, KA, Quraishi, SM, Graubard, BI, Weber, JP, Rubertone MV,Erickson, RL. Persistent Organochlorine Pesticides and Risk ofTesticular Germ Cell Tumors. Journal of the National Cancer institute May 2008 100: 603.
PANNA Summary: Exposure to DDT and other organochlorinepesticides has been suggested to cause a risk of testicular germ celltumors. The authors tested serum and found that an increased exposureto DDE, a breakdown of DDT, may be associated with the risk ofdeveloping testicular germ cell tumors, especially during fetal life orfrom breastmilk.
Abstract: Background: Exposure to endocrine-disruptingchemicals, such as persistent organochlorine pesticides, has beensuggested to increase the risk of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs).
Methods: To study the relationship of POP exposure to TGCT risk,prediagnostic serum samples from 754 case subjects and 928 controlsubjects enrolled in the Servicemen’s Testicular Tumor Environmentaland Endocrine Determinants Study were analyzed for cis-nonachlor,trans-nonachlor, oxychlordane, total chlordanes,β-hexachlorocyclohexane, mirex, p,p'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene(p,p'-DDE), and p,p'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. Adjusted oddsratios (ORs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) forthe risk of TGCT overall and for the histological subgroups, seminomaand nonseminoma, were estimated using multivariable logisticregression. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: TGCT risk was statistically significantly associated withhigher plasma levels of p,p'-DDE (for highest quartile [Q4] vs lowestquartile [Q1], OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.23 to 2.38, Ptrend = .0002) and oftwo chlordane components, cis-nonachlor (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.56, 95% CI =1.11 to 2.18, Ptrend = .009) and trans-nonachlor (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.46,95% CI = 1.07 to 2.00, Ptrend = .026). Seminoma risk was statisticallysignificantly associated with p,p'-DDE (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.91, 95% CI =1.22 to 2.99, Ptrend = .0008), cis-nonachlor (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.93, 95%CI = 1.27 to 2.93, Ptrend = .0045), trans-nonachlor (Q4 vs Q1, OR =1.72, 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.67, Ptrend = .033), and a chlordanemetabolite, oxychlordane (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.04 to 2.60,Ptrend = .048), whereas nonseminoma risk showed a statisticallysignificant association with p,p'-DDE only (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.63, 95% CI= 1.10 to 2.42, Ptrend = .0044).
Conclusions: Increased exposure to p,p'-DDE may be associated with therisk of both seminomatous and nonseminomatous TGCTs, whereas exposureto chlordane compounds and metabolites may be associated with the riskof seminoma. Because evidence suggests that TGCT is initiated in veryearly life, it is possible that exposure to these persistent organicpesticides during fetal life or via breast feeding may increase therisk of TGCT in young men.
PANNA Summary: After analyzing the research already doneonenvironmental pollutants and breast cancer, the authors conclude thatmore research measuring toxicity needs to be done. They also suggestthe development of better methods to measure exposure to toxicpollutants. Progress has been made in the last five years.
Abstract: Laboratory research has shown that numerousenvironmental pollutants cause mammary gland tumors in animals; arehormonally active, specifically mimicking estrogen, which is a breastcancer risk factor; or affect susceptibility of the mammary gland tocarcinogenesis. An assessment of epidemiologic research on thesepollutants identified in toxicologic studies can guide future researchand exposure reduction aimed at prevention. The PubMed database wassearched for relevant literature and systematic critical reviews wereentered in a database available atURL:www.silentspring.org/sciencereview and URL:www.komen.org/environment(accessed April 10, 2007). Based on arelatively small number of studies, the evidence to date generallysupports an association between breast cancer and polycyclic aromatichydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in conjunctionwith certain genetic polymorphisms involved in carcinogen activationand steroid hormone metabolism. Evidence regarding dioxins and organicsolvents is sparse and methodologically limited but suggestive of anassociation. Methodologic problems include inadequate exposureassessment, a lack ofaccess to highly exposed and unexposedpopulations, and a lack of preclinical markers to identify associationsthat may be obscured by disease latency. Among chemicals identified intoxicologic research as relevant to breast cancer, many have not beeninvestigated in humans.The development of better exposure assessmentmethods is needed to fillthis gap. In the interim, weaknesses in theepidemiologic literature argue for greater reliance on toxicologicstudies to develop national policies to reduce chemical exposures thatmay be associated with breast cancer. Substantial research progress inthe last 5 years suggests that the investigation of environmentalpollutants will lead to strategies to reduce breast cancer risk. Cancer2007. © 2007American Cancer Society. 1Silent Spring Institute,Newton,Massachusetts 2 Department of Epidemiology, Roswell ParkCancerInstitute, Buffalo, New York email: Julia Green Brodybrody@silentspring.org Correspondence to Julia Green Brody, SilentSpring Institute, 29 Crafts Street, Newton, MA 02458 Fax: (617) 332-4284
PANNA Summary: The authors compared DDT in blood from women inOakland,California taken between 1959-1967 and breast cancer in thesame women years later. Women with high percentages of DDT in theirblood were five times more likely to have breast cancer.
Abstract: Background: Prior studies of DDT and breast cancerassessed exposure later in lifewhen the breast may not have beenvulnerable, after most DDT had been eliminated, and after DDT had beenbanned.
Objectives: Investigate whether DDT exposure in young women during peak DDT use predicts breast cancer.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, nested case-control study with amediantime to diagnosis of 17 years using blood samples obtained fromyoung women from 1959-1967. Subjects were members of the Child Healthand Development Studies, Oakland, California, who provided bloodsamples 1to 3 days after giving birth (mean age 26 years). Cases(n=129)developed breast cancer before age 50 years. Controls (n=129)were matched to cases on birth year. Serum was assayed for p,p’-DDT,the active ingredient of DDT, o,p’-DDT a low concentration contaminant,andp,p’-DDE, the most abundant p,p’-DDT metabolite.
Results:High levels of serum p,p’-DDT predicted a statisticallysignificantfive-fold increased risk of breast cancer among women whowere born after 1931. These women were under age 14 in 1945, when DDTcame into widespread use and mostly under age 20 as DDT use peaked.Women who were not exposed to p,p’-DDT before age 14 showed noassociation between p,p’-DDT and breast cancer (p=0.02 for differenceby age).
Conclusions:Exposure to p,p’-DDT early in life may increase breast cancer risk.Many U.S. women heavily exposed to DDT in childhood have not yetreached age 50. The public health significance of DDT exposure inearlylife may be large.
Full text: http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2007/10260/abstract.html
PANNA Summary: Primary liver cancer is the sixth most commoncancer in the world. In China, DDT was banned for agricultural usein1983 but continues to produce for the manufacture of dicofol, a nonsystemic acaricide, for use in residential spraying in antimalarialcampaigns.The dominant type of cancer in China too is hepatocellularcarcinoma.This study thus studies the risk of liver cancer in Linxian,Chinawhich has a comparatively low incidence of cancer. The results ofthis study indicated that there was a high risk of liver cancer inassociation with high levels of DDT. Animal studies have shown thatDDThas a detrimental effect on the nervous system as well as the liver.Also, animal studies have found that undernourished animals have acloser association between liver cancer and DDT. Lixian populationisalso poorly nourished. Hence it is possible that DDT is particularlycarcinogenic in humans who suffer from malnutrition. While the studydoes have several limitations, the findings do indicate that DDTexposure may be a risk factor for liver cancer in humans directlyexposed to DDT.
Abstract: Background:1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2-bis( p -chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT) exposure has beendemonstrated to cause liver tumors in laboratory rodents. DDT’spersistent metabolite and environmental degradationproduct,1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis( p -chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE), has alsobeen associated with liver tumors in laboratory animals. Whether DDTand DDE are associated with hepatocarcinogenesis in humans is not clear.
Methods: We carried out a nested case – control study among theparticipants ofthe Nutritional Intervention Trials in Linxian, China.The case group included 168 individuals who developed liver cancerduring the trials,and the control group included 385 individualsfrequency-matched on ageand sex who were alive and well at the end ofthe study. Serum concentrations of DDT and DDE were measured by gaschromatography –mass spectrometry. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidenceintervals (CIs)were calculated using multivariable analysis.
Results: In multivariable adjusted models, the risk of developing livercancer increased with increased serum DDT concentration (OR forquintile 1versus quintile 5 = 3.8, 95% CI = 1.7 to 8.6, P trend =.0024). In contrast, there was no statistically significant associationbetween liver cancer and serum DDE concentration. The associationbetween high serum DDT concentration and liver cancer was strongeramong individuals with DDE concentrations below the median value (oddsratio for tertile 3 versus tertile 1 = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.45 to 8.74)than those with concentrations above the median (OR = 1.70, 95% CI =0.97 to 2.98). A calculation of crude liver cancer risk found thatthere would be 26 liver cancers per 100 000 persons per year in thelowest quintile ofDDT exposure versus 46 liver cancers per 100 000persons per year in the highest quintile of DDT exposure.
Conclusions: DDT may be a risk factor for liver cancer, particularlyamong persons with lower DDE concentrations. Risk may be particularlyincreased among persons exposed directly to DDT resulting in a higherratio of DDT toDDE) or, alternatively, risk may be associated withindividual ability to metabolize DDT to DDE.
PANNA summary: This article traces the health impacts andeffectiveness or lack of effectiveness for countries continuing to useDDT for malaria control after its inclusion in the Stockholm Conventionlist of chemicals targeted for a global ban in 2001. Due to a lack ofcontrolled testing and conflicting or inconclusive data it wasimpossible to determine the specific negative health effects of DDT.Theauthors call for more research to determine if the health risksoutweigh the health benefits.
Abstract: DDT (bis[4-chlorophenyl]-1,1,1-trichloroethane) is apersistent insecticide that was used worldwide from the mid-1940s untilits ban in the USA and other countries in the 1970s. When a global banon DDT was proposed in 2001, several countries in sub-Saharan Africaclaimed that DDT was still needed as a cheap and effective meansforvector control. Although DDT is generally not toxic to human beingsandwas banned mainly for ecological reasons, subsequent research hasshown that exposure to DDT at amounts that would be needed in malariacontrol might cause preterm birth and early weaning, abrogating thebenefit of reducing infant mortality from malaria. Historically, DDThas had mixed success in Africa ; only the countries that are able tofind and devote substantial resources towards malaria control have mademajor advances. DDT might be useful in controlling malaria, but theevidence of its adverse effects on human health needs appropriateresearch on whetherit achieves a favourable balance of risk versusbenefit. (EpidemiologyBranch, USNational Institute of EnvironmentalHealth Sciences, P O Box12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. rogan@niehs.nih.gov)
PANNA summary: This report is concerned solely with DDT in theUSA, sothere is very little attention paid to malaria or DDT’s use forvector control. The profile provides clear explanations of why DDT isstill inthe U.S. environment when it was banned for use in this countryin1972, how it persists in the soil and water, and how it moves fromone place to another. The report cites many possible dangers of thetoxinto public health. Health effects cited in this report include:nervous system effects, changes in liver enzymes, and “harmful effects”on reproduction and adrenal gland function. EPA has classified DDT andits metabolites as probable human carcinogens, though this report saysthat there is no evidence of increased cancer risk in humans.
(no abstract available)
PANNA summary: This 2001 landmark study by the NationalInstitute of Environmental Health Sciences and three otherorganizations found a strong relationship between prematurely deliveredand low birth weight babies and mothers' blood levels of DDE, themetabolic breakdown product of DDT. The study took its data fromchildren born between the years 1959 and 1966, a time when DDT wasstill being used in the United States and so average blood levels ofDDE were much higher than they are in the U.S. today, but still lowerthan what they are in other countries where DDT is still being used tocontrol malaria. The researchers conclude that the ties betweenpremature birth rates, amajor factor in infant mortality, and bloodlevels of DDE should lead to the reassessment of the costs and benefitsof DDT-based malaria control strategies around the world.
Abstract: DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl)ethane) is highly effective against most malaria-transmittingmosquitoes and is being widely used in malaria-endemic areas. Themetabolite, DDE(1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethylene), hasbeen linked to pre-term birth in small studies, but these findings areinconclusive. Our aim was to investigate the association between DDEexposure and pre-term birth.
Methods: Our study was based on the U.S. Collaborative PerinatalProject (CPP). From this study we selected a subset of more than 44,000eligible children born between 1959 and 1966 and measured the DDEconcentration in their mothers' serum samples stored during pregnancy.Complete data were available for 2,380 children, of whom 361 were bornpre-term and 221 were small-for-gestational age.
Findings: The median maternal DDE concentration was 25 µg/L(range3-178)--several fold higher than current US concentrations. Theadjusted odds ratios (OR) of pre-term birth increased steadily withincreasing concentrations of serum DDE (ORs=1, 1·5, 1·6, 2·5, 3·1;trendp<0·0001). Adjusted odds of small-for-gestational-age alsoincreased, but less consistently (ORs=1, 1·9, 1·7, 1·6, 2·6;trendp=0·04). After excluding pre-term births, the association of DDEwith small-for-gestational-age remained.
Interpretation: The findings strongly suggest that DDT use increasespre-term births, which is a major contributor to infant mortality. Ifthis association is causal, it should be included in any assessment ofthe costs and benefits of vector control with DDT.
PANNA summary: In light of recent findings that the metabolicbyproduct of DDT, DDE, blocks receptors for androgens (male hormones)in rats, scientists undertook this study to see if there is somesimilar effectin humans. They looked at data for mothers' blood levelsof DDE (seearticle #1) and the frequency of birth defects in malebabies from the same set of children born between 1959 and 1966. Theyfound thatelevated DDE levels in the mother's blood serum correlatedwith increased incidence of undescended testicles, penis abnormalities,and extra nipples in male children.
Abstract: 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethylene(p,p'-DDE) is a metabolite of the insecticide 2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (DDT) and is a ubiquitousenvironmental contaminant. Nearly everyone in the United States has adetectable serum level of DDE. DDE was recently found to inhibitbinding of androgen to its receptor and to block androgen action inrodents. Normal development of male genitalia in mammals depends onandrogen action. The authors used stored serum samples to examine therelation between maternal DDE levels during pregnancy and adjusted oddsof cryptorchidism (n = 219), hypospadias (n = 199), and polythelia(extranipples) (n = 167) among male offspring, using a nestedcase-control design with one control group (n = 552). Subjects wereselected from the Collaborative Perinatal Project, a US birth cohortstudy begun in 1959-1966, when DDE levels were much higher than theyare at present.Compared with boys whose mother's recovery-adjustedserum DDE level wasless than 21.4 microg/liter, boys with maternallevels greater than orequal to 85.6 microg/liter had adjusted oddsratios of 1.3 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7, 2.4) forcrypt-orchidism, 1.2 (95% CI:0.6, 2.4) for hypospadias, and 1.9 (95%CI: 0.9, 4.0) for polythelia. For cryptorchidism and polythelia, theresults were consistent with a modest-to-moderate association, but inno instance was the estimatevery precise. The results wereinconclusive. (Epidemiology Branch,National Institute of EnvironmentalHealth Sciences, Research TrianglePark, NC 27709, USA. longnecker@niehs.nih.gov)
PANNA Summary: Based on previous research, the authors proposethat uptake and elimination, two coexisting processes, control thechanges in serum levels of DDT and its metabolites; and that these twoprocesses switch with age. To confirm this, the authors compared therates of change in addition to the change in levels. They found anincrease in DDT metabolites for the older group (=21 years) and adecrease in serum levels for the younger group (3 to 20 years) over a12-month period. Their data indicate that DDT levels increased fasterinthe older group than in the younger group, and that there is a morerapid reduction in serum DDT in the younger group. The authors'findings and analyses support the proposition that the body's rateand,perhaps, process of eliminating DDT is different in children thanin adults.
Abstract: Blood samples were obtained on four occasions over a12-month period from individuals living in KwaZulu , South Africa , whohad been exposed to DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane)as a consequence of its use in their homes to control transmission ofmalaria. The longitudinal changes in serum DDT and its majormetabolities, DDE and DDD, were determined. No additional risk wasconsidered to have been presented by the increases that occurredfollowing application of the pesticide. There were significantincreases in DDT, DDE and DDT (DDT + its metabolites) for the agegroup=21 years, but for the age group 3-20 years a reduction in serum levelsoccurred over 12 months. Two concurrent processes probably govern theincrease and decrease in serum levels, and the relative contributionsof each interchange as the individual becomes older. Theresults suggestthat children in KwaZulu experience conditions that differ from thoseof their parents, as well as from those that affect children indeveloped countries. In consequence, it is desirable that riskassessments of vector control chemicals consider all sectors of apopulation. (Department of Zoology, Potchefstroom University forChristian Higher Education, South Africa.)
PANNA Summary: This study analyzes serum levels of DDT and itsmetabolites of siblings in eight homesteads. The authors conclude thatthere is a strong correlation between siblings under malaria controlconditions and serum levels of DDT. They recommend that childrenalwaysbe included in environmental exposure studies and that separaterisk assessments be done, since the young experience differentenvironmental circumstances and are especially vulnerable duringdevelopment.
(no abstract available)
Abstract: The World Health Organization (WHO) considers1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT) safe to man and theenvironment when applied intra-domiciliary for malaria control.Research into the possible health effects under prevailing conditionsand taking social customs into account, have, however, beenlacking.This study was undertaken to determine levels of DDT in serumand breast-milk and possible risks posed by the insecticide to thehealth of lactating mothers and their infants. The aims of the studywere: (1)To determine the levels of DDT and its metabolites, DDD andDDE, in the serum of members of families from a sprayed and anon-sprayed area, as well as changes caused by indoor application ofDDT; (2) To determine the levels of DDT and its metabolites in thebreast-milk of mothers from a sprayed and a non-sprayed area, as wellas changes caused by indoor application of DDT; (3) To determine theuptake of DDT and its metabolites by the infant via breast-milk, and todevelop a statistical model that describes the dynamics; and (4) Todetermine the risk to the health of mother and infant posed by exposureto DDT and its metabolites.
PANNA summary: This study found that blood levels of DDT andits metabolites are higher in people who work as DDT sprayers than forthe general population in KwaZulu, South Africa, where DDT is used formalaria control. Possible health risks to the sprayers from theseelevated levels, including evidence of reduced liver function, wereidentified.
Abstract: The levels of DDT and metabolites in serum of 23applicators involved in malaria control operations in Natal weredetermined using gas chromatography with electron capture detection.The mean levels(microgram/l, ppb) were 61.7 DDT, 129.3 DDE, 11.0 DDDand 202.0 sigma DDT. Percentage DDT was 33.4%. These levels were higherthan for an age matched sample of the general population in KwaZulu,who are protected by DDT against malaria. Percentage DDT correlatednegatively with age(P less than 0.05) for the applicators, suggesting achange in pharmacodynamics with age. Mean serum albumin, alkalinephosphatase,aspartate transferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT)levels did not differ significantly from an age-matched control group,but the mean GGT value for the applicators was higher than the maximumof the laboratory normal range. Although not clinically significant,the alanine transferase was significantly higher in the applicatorsthan in the control group. These higher levels suggest a possible riskto the health of the sprayers, but uncertainties remain. (ResearchInstitutefor Environmental Diseases of the South African MedicalResearchCouncil, Pretoria.)
PANNA Summary: The authors established that the average levelof DDTand its metabolites was higher in the population exposed toin-house DDT application for malaria control than in the control group.The researchers also discovered that the levels of DDT and itsmetabolites decreased between the ages of three and twenty-nine years,yet following age twenty-nine, the levels began to increase again.Based on these results, the authors suggest that different processesgovern DDT dynamics with relation to age. They also tested liverfunction and found that, although DDT metabolite levels correlate withlevels of the liver protein, alcohol consumption better predicted liverprotein levels. Thus, the authors conclude that “DDT as used formalariacontrol does not adversely affect the liver function.”
Abstract: Concentrations of p,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDE, and p,p'-DDDwere determined in serum of members of households of two differentareas of KwaZulu. Annual intradomiciliary application of DDT is usedfor the interruption of malaria transmission in one area (the exposedgroup) while the other served as the control. Demographic differencesbetween the two groups resulted in significantly more females in thecontrol group. The two groups were comparable with respect to age.Serum from household members living in DDT-treated dwellings hadsignificantly higher (p < .005) levels of DDT and metabolites (mean?DDT 140.9µg/l) than those from the control area (mean ?DDT 6.04 µg/l).Percentage DDT was also significantly higher (p < .05) in theexposed group (28.9%) than the control group (8.3%). DDT for the 3-10yrage interval (168.6 µg/l) was significantly higher (p < .05) thanthe20-29 (60.5 µg/l) and 30-39 (84.2 µg/l) yr age intervals. There seemedto be two groups with regard to accumulation and elimination.The agegroup 3-29 appeared to be eliminating DDT, most likely accumulated fromcontaminated breast milk, faster than they accumulated it. From around29 yr of age accumulation predominated as the levels increased withage. Regression analysis suggested pharmacokinetic differences for DDEand DDT between the two groups. Liver function parameters between thetwo groups only differed significantly for gamma-glutamyl transferase(g GT) (p < .005), but the influence of difference in alcoholconsumption, which was significantly higher inthe exposed group (p <.0001), offered a better explanation. Those of the exposed group thatconsumed alcohol had a significantly higher(p < .05) mean g GT level(41.5 IU/l) than those that did not (20.2IU/l), but were notsignificantly different for DDT (p > .05). The safety of DDT used inmalaria control for subjects aged 3 and older was confirmed by thelevels of DDT in serum when compared with other studies, which showedlack of any negative effects associated with these levels in adults,and an apparently normal liver function in the exposed and controlgroups. (Research Institute for EnvironmentalDiseases, Medical ResearchCouncil, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.)
PANNA Summary: The Chinese cities for this study included:Kashi, Kuerle, Kelamayi, Jiayuguan, Urumchi, Ejinaqi, Lanzhou, Xi’ning,Changchun, Shenyang, Beijing, Tianjin, Xi’an, Shijiazhuang, Taiyuan,Hohhot, Xinxiang, Zhengzhou, Guiyang, Chongquing, Kunming, Chengdu,Wuhan, Changsha, Hefei, Zhuzhou, Nanchang, Guangzhou, Nanning,Hangzhou, Nanjing, Dalian, Tsingdao, Fuzhou, Xiamen, Haikou, Beihai,Hok Tsui, Waliguan, and Xianghuangqi.
The key findings from this Study were relatively high levels of DDTs(summation of o,p′-DDT, p,p′-DDT and p,p′-DDE) were observed mostly inthe cities of southern, southwestern and central parts of China. In thesummer, high chlordane levels are observed in southern, southwesternand eastern China, indicating a fresh chlordane input. In autumn, highlevels were found in northern, eastern, and southern China, signifyinga fresh use of chlordane in these regions. China is an important globalsource for HCB. Endosulfan was mainly used for controlling cottonbollworm in China, and geographically, the high concentrations of totalendosulfan occurred in the cotton production areas in China.
Abstract: Chinahas a history of large scale production and application oforganochlorine pesticides (OCPs) although, data on their nationwidedistribution and seasonal variations in the atmosphere is still sparse.Passive air samplers (PAS) were therefore utilized to obtain seasonaldata from 37 Chinese cities and three background sites in 2005.Concentrations and spatial and seasonal distribution ofdichlorodiphenyltrichloroethanes (DDTs), chlordanes (CHLs),hexachlorobenzene (HCB), and endosulfans (Endo) are presented in thispaper, and their potential sources are discussed based on the data-set.It is estimated that ca. 95% of DDTs present in the atmosphere ofChinese cities was still from technical DDT, while only ca.
5%was “dicofol-type of DDT”. DDT application for public health controland DDT activated antifouling paint for fishing ships may be the twomost important current sources of technical DDT. The DDT concentrationsin several Chinese cities seem to match well with the reported DDTconcentrations in human breast milk. A low TC/CC ratio was observedacross China in the winter to spring, which may provide a fingerprintof Chinese chlordane emission. It was suggested that “weathered”chlordane emitted from urban construction foundations in winter maygive the distinctively low TC/CC ratio. The data showed that China isan important global source for HCB. Higher HCB concentrations wereobserved in winter and spring, and in colder cities, highlighting animportant contribution from combustion sources. Samples with higherendosulfan concentrations occurred in the cotton production areas,indicating its major use in killing cotton pests.
Persistence of organochlorine chemical residues in fish from theTombigbee River (Alabama, USA): Continuing risk to wildlife from aformer DDT manufacturing facility. Environmental Pollution, August 2008
PANNA Summary:
Abstract: Organochlorinepesticide and total polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations weremeasured in largemouth bass from the Tombigbee River near a former DDTmanufacturing facility at McIntosh, Alabama. Evaluation of mean p,p′- and o,p′-DDT isomer concentrations and o,p′- versus p,p′-isomerproportions in McIntosh bass indicated that DDT is moving off site fromthe facility and into the Tombigbee River. Concentrations of p,p′-DDTisomers in McIntosh bass remained unchanged from 1974 to 2004 and werefour times greater than contemporary concentrations from a nationalprogram. Total DDT in McIntosh bass exceeded dietary effectconcentrations developed for bald eagle and osprey. Hexachlorobenzene,PCBs, and toxaphene concentrations in bass from McIntosh also exceededthresholds to protect fish and piscivorous wildlife. Whereasconcentrations of DDT and most other organochlorine chemicals in fishhave generally declined in the U.S. since their ban, concentrations ofDDT in fish from McIntosh remain elevated and represent a threat towildlife. DDT persists in the environment near a former manufacturing facilitythat ceased production over 40 years ago, and concentrations representa risk to fish and piscivorous birds in the area.
Geisz, HN, Dickhut, RM, Cochran, MA, Fraser, WR, Ducklow HW. MeltingGlaciers: A Probable Source of DDT to the Antarctic Marine Ecosystem, Environmental Science and Technology, Feb 2008
PANNA Summary: Researchers found DDE and DDT in penguinsconfined to an island in the Antarctic. They continue to find DDT inthe penguins over the last thirty years, which means there is continuedexposure. The scientists believe the melting glaciers are releasing DDTand the penguins are continually exposed through the meltwater.
Abstract: Persistent organic pollutants reach polar regions bylongrange atmospheric transport and biomagnify through the food webaccumulating in higher trophic level predators. We analyzed Ade´liepenguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) samples collected from 2004 to 2006 toevaluate current levels of ΣDDT (p,p′-DDT+p,p′-DDE) in these birds,which are confined to Antarctica. Ratios of p,p′-DDT to p,p′-DDE inAde´lie penguins have declined significantly since 1964 indicatingcurrent exposure to old rather than new sources of ΣDDT. However, ΣDDThas not declined in Ade´lie penguins from the Western AntarcticPeninsula for more than 30 years and the presence of p,p′- DDT in thesebirds indicates that there is a current source of DDTto the Antarctic marine food web. DDT has been banned or severelyrestricted since peak use in the 1970s, implicating glaciermeltwater as a likely source for DDT contamination in coastal Antarcticseas. Our estimates indicate that 1-4 kg · y-1 ΣDDT are currently beingreleased into coastal waters along the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet dueto glacier ablation.
PANNA Summary: Between 1947 and 1971, Montrose Chemical's plantin Torrance, California flushed more than 100 tons of DDT into thecounty sewer system, where it ran into the Pacific Ocean near thecliffs of Palos Verdes. DDT remains on the ocean floor and is thenation's deepest and largest Superfund site. DDT levels in the bodiesof fish caught in this area and sold in Los Angeles are much higherthan government safety standards. EPA is filing suit against MontroseChemical to pay for the cost of cleaning up and restoring the watersoff Palos Verdes.
(no abstract available)
PANNA summary: A report on studies funded by the UK'sDepartment for International Development looking at the recovery oflocal wildlife known to have been affected after DDT spraying fortsetse fly control in northwestern Zimbabwe 10 years earlier. Theauthor argues that DDThas had relatively little impact on wildlifepopulations in the area compared with the widespread woodlanddestruction by immigrant farmers and elephants. Deltamethrin, asynthetic pyrethroid that would perhaps have less impact on wildlife,has been used successfully for ground spraying instead of DDT, but itstill costs too much to make it a viable solution. This report aims toin form use of DDT for tsetse fly control under the new POPs treatythat allows for limited use for vector control.
(no abstract available)
PANNA summary: Traces the use of organochlorine insecticides(including DDT) in Africa and the levels of organochlorinessubsequently found inthe tissues of terrestrial and aquatic animals.The authors found that levels, especially of DDT and diedrin, were"high enough to have considerable potential for chronic toxicity, forcausing behavioral changes, or even for killing wild animals,particularly fish and birds and possibly crocodiles." The author warnsagainst possible long-term population effects on the fauna of Africa ifthe use of organochlorinesis not restricted.
Abstract: Organochlorine insecticides (OCLs), which wereintroduced inthe decade following World War II, were used extensivelyin Europe, the U.S., and other developed countries into the 1970s.However, data began to accumulate on their persistence in soils andaquatic sediments,their potential to be taken up into animal tissuesand to bioconcentrate in birds and mammals in the higher tropic levelsof foodchains and even in humans. As a result, registration authoritiesphased out their use progressively, in Europe and the U.S., from 1973onward.However, the production of OCLs in developed countries and theiruse in developing countries continued through the 1970s and 1980s intothe1990s because they were no longer under patent agreement, wereinexpensive to manufacture, and were very effective in pest control. InAfrica, the use of OCLs continued well into the 1990s for the controlof mosquitoes, tsetse flies, and desert locusts as well as to combatvarious crop, animal, and human pests. Some of these uses involvedextensive spraying of large areas of nonagricultural land, therebyexposing many groups and species of wildlife to their residues.Although there is some evidence of a gradual decline in the use of OCLsin Africa, they are still being used in appreciable quantities. Duringthe past 25 years, there have been 50 published reports of OCL residuesin the various groups of invertebrate and vertebrate animalsconstituting the African fauna. These have been based on a diverserange of surveys, target animals, sampling methods, and analyticaltechniques. Moreover, they are extremely regionally-biased, the mostintense surveys being in Zimbabwe, Kenya, Egypt, and South Africa. DDTwas the most commonly used OCL, accounting for about half the totaluse, followed closely by dieldrin and HCH. Birds and fish have beensampled most intensively, with relatively few studies on other taxa. Wereviewed the OCL residue data on African fauna from these reports andsummarized the maximum and mean residues in the various groups ofterrestrial and aquatic invertebrates and vertebrates. Overall,residuesin the fauna were the greatest for DDT, followed in turn by those ofdieldrin, HCH, endosulfan, and endrin, with small amounts of aldrin andtoxaphene being found in some animals. There were relatively fewreports of OCL residues in terrestrial invertebrates and virtually nonein aquatic invertebrates. Only a few reports demonstrated OCL residuesin terrestrial vertebrates, although high levels of DDT,dieldrin, andHCH were found in crocodile eggs and large residues of dieldrinoccurred in bats, squirrels, and monkeys. Considerable OCL residueswere reported in a few species of fish, especially Barbus, Clarias,Hydrocynus, Labeo, Sarotherodon, Epiplatys, and Synodontis.Theseresidues were at levels that could have caused chronic toxicity orbehavioral changes. The calculated maximum and mean OCL residues in thevarious elements of the African fauna until 1995 were compared withthose calculated for corresponding faunal groups in Europe and theU.S.from their development and introduction up to 1973. The OCLresiduesreported in African fauna between 1971 and 1975 tended to besignificantly higher overall than those published for Europe andtheU.S. In particular, residues of DDT and dieldrin in African birdsandtheir eggs were greater than those that had been incriminated ascausing significant eggshell thinning and reproductive failure inEuropean and U.S. aquatic and terrestrial birds up to 1973.Additionally, high DDT and dieldrin residues were reported from somespecies of African fish at levels that could potentially affect theirreproduction, have chronic toxic and behavioral effects, and evendrastically affect populations. Holistic case studies on the use ofOCLs to control tsetse flies and desert locusts were discussed. OCLlevels in trophic levels of fauna associated with Lake Kariba (betweenZambia and Zimbabwe) were summarized. (Swedish UniversityofAgricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden)
For assistance with gathering elements for stories, feel free to contact Campaigns Director Kristin Schafer at 415 981-1771, kristins@panna.org
Sustainable solutions to the global malaria challenge
PAN International and other public health and environmental experts organized a protest in Budapest of the September 2006 WHO announcement giving DDT a“clean bill of health” for malaria control. We demanded that WHO reverse their position, and called on the hundreds of governmental officials gathered in Budapest to join in this demand.

Health and environmental experts from around the world gathered in Budapest, Hungary for nine days in September 2006 for two very important meetings on toxics protections.
The first meeting was a General Assembly of the International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN) a global network of over 400 organizations working on the elimination of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and implementation of the international Stockholm Convention (POPs treaty). At the IPEN strategy meeting, members formed a coalition response to the September 15, 2006 decision by the World Health Organization (WHO) to promote spraying of DDT, one of the POPs chemicals, inside people's homes in Africa for malaria control.
The next meeting was with the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety involving hundreds of government officials and policy makers from around the world as well as public health advocates. There, more groups spoke out. PAN International and others are also contacting WHO's board of directors directly, demanding that they reverse their promotion of widespread DDT use.
Paul Saoke, MD, Executive Director of Physicians for SocialResponsibility in Kenya, speaks to the health effects of DDT and availability of alternatives.
Dr. Romeo Quijano, President of PAN Philippines and Sarogeni Rengam, Regional Coordinator of PAN Asia-Pacific issued this response to WHO.
PANNA's Medha Chandra speaks with a reporter in Budapest.At the IFCS meeting, this joint statement from PAN International, IPEN and the International Society of Doctors for the Environment was delivered to delegates.
From New Zealand, Pesticide Action Network Aotearoa & Safe Food Campaign issued this response.
At the meeting, PANNA distributed copies of its recent fact sheet “DDT & Malaria: Setting the Record Straight.”
Other documents prepared by PAN International and distributed at IFCS meeting:
DDT was used heavily worldwide in the 1950s and 1960s both in agricultural production and for malaria control. DDT has been widely banned because of it builds up in the food chain where it persists in fatty tissues of animals and humans (it can be monitored in human breastmilk), its ability to move from tropical to temperate zones where break down is further delayed, and its association with a number of chronic illnesses. For these reasons, many governments have banned DDT, and addressed its elimination over time in the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs treaty).
The WHO malaria eradication program of the 1950s and 1960s helped to control malaria in many places, but wiping out malaria with DDT was an unrealistic goal. One of the many reasons for the failure of this ambitious effort was resistance to DDT among malaria-carrying mosquitoes. Taking into account that resistance arose largely from agricultural use and cross-resistance to pyrethroid insecticides, by 1972 nineteen species of mosquitoes were resistant to DDT in Africa. Resistance continues to be a problem.
Often DDT intended for indoor spraying to control mosquitos is diverted to illegal agricultural use, increasing the danger for human exposure and hastening the development of resistant mosquito populations.
New DDT use adds to exposure from old stockpiles that are not properly contained or controlled. The Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations estimates there are more than 100,000 tons of obsolete pesticide stockpiles in Africa, mostly older chemicals such as DDT.
New demands for DDT use for malaria control also increase the burden on the communities living near production plants. A DDT factory in the Eloor-Edayar region in India has a long record of contaminating the environment, including rivers. The local community is now protesting their poisoning as a result of emissions from this factory.
Malaria solutions require both curative and preventive strategies. Prevention programs include a range of elements: improved sanitation, water drainage, public education and surveillance of cases in malarial areas, insecticide-treated and long-lasting bed nets, and controlling and reducing the mosquito vectors of malaria. Integrated vector management, rather than reliance on a single factor, is fundamental to success, as is the involvement of affected communities.
The World Health Organization reports that in 2004, some 3.2 billion people in 107 countries lived in areas at risk of malaria transmission. Forty-nine percent of the world's population lives in areas where malaria is transmitted. Each year, 300-500 million people are affected by malaria. In 2005, UNICEF estimated that the cost of effectively controlling the disease in the 82 countries with the highest burden was about $3.2 billion annually.
Roughly 80-90% of malaria cases occur in sub-Saharan Africa, and over 80% of malaria deaths - around 800,000 a year - occur among African children under age five.
The recent renewed attention to malaria control is a welcome and long overdue development. With significant resources and political commitment, the international community now has an opportunity to build on the many successful programs and experiences with malaria control over the years.

This compilation of articles will be updated periodically and it is by no means comprehensive. The articles are arranged by category and inchronological order with the newest studies first. We hope it will prove to be a useful tool in the ongoing discussion among policymakers, advocacy groups and the media regarding the use of DDT and the need to improve efforts to effectively control malaria.
1. Cost-Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions When Malaria Mortality is Low: Insecticide-Treated Nets Versus In-House Residual Spraying in India.
2. Epidemic malaria in the Menoreh Hills of central Java.
3. Social and cultural aspects of malaria.
4. Malaria past and present: The case of North Sulawesi, Indonesia.
5. No Future in DDT: A case study of India.
6. Cost-effectiveness and sustainability of lambdacyhalothrin-treated mosquito nets in comparison to DDT spraying for malaria control in western Thailand.
7. Current scenario of malaria in India.
8. Ecology, economics, and political will: The vicissitudes of malaria strategies in Asia.
9. Environmental management in malaria control in India
10. Impact of pesticide use in India
Available Online at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/
PANNA Summary: In India , a low malaria mortality region, both insecticide-treated nets and in-house residual spraying are effective in preventing malaria. Nets are more effective and more efficient than residual spraying, although nets cost more. Additionally, the amount of insecticide used for treated nets was much less than that used for spraying. Although unlikely, residual spraying may become more cost-effective than treated nets under certain circumstances.
Abstract: Malaria is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the developing world and a major public health problem in India . Disillusioned by in-house residual spraying (IRS), and increasingly aware that insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) have proved to be effective in reducing malaria mortality and morbidity in various epidemiological settings, policy-makers in India are keen to identify which is the more cost-effective malaria control intervention. A community randomized controlled trial was set up in Surat to compare the effectiveness and efficiency of IRS and ITNs. Both control strategies were shown to be effective in preventing malaria over the base-case scenario of early diagnosis and prompt treatment. The mean costs per case averted for ITNs was statistically lower (Rs. 1848, 1567-2209; US$ 52) than IRS (Rs. 3121, 2386-4177, US$ 87). The conclusions were robust to changes in assumptions. This study expands the scope of recent comparative economic evaluations of ITNs and IRS, since it was carried out in a low mortality malaria endemic area. (Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics , Houghton Street , London WC2A 2AE , UK .)
PANNA summary: DDT spraying and the introduction of chloroquine medication for malaria starting in the 1950s virtually eradicated endemic malaria from the island of Java. DDT spraying was abandoned by the Republic of Indonesia in the late 1980s and stocks were depleted by the early 1990s. Spraying of less effective and more expensive pesticides continued through the early 1990s. This study shows that the sharp decline in government spending on malaria control since the economic downturn of the late 1990s, especially the curtailment of indoor spraying, has lead to a real epidemic of malaria in the hills of central Java. The authors call for a revival of residual indoor spraying programs as the only proven effective solution to the outbreak.
Abstract: After more than 50 years of effective management, resurgent malaria threatens residents in the Menoreh Hills and the foothills of the Dieng Plateau of Central Java, Indonesia. The Dieng Plateau dominates the highland center of Central Java. The steep Menoreh Hills, surrounded by rice paddy habitats, cover approximately 500 km2 with no peaks greater than 1,000 m. We studied epidemic malaria in Purworejo district, one of the three districts containing the Menoreh Hills. Between 1986 and 1995, the annual parasite incidence (API) in Purworejo ranged from 2 to 11 cases per 1,000 residents per year and was typically approximately 5 per 1,000. In 2000 the API was 44.5. This sharp increase was confined to subdistricts in and around the Menoreh Hills and Dieng Plateau foothills. The primary vectors of malaria, those favoring steep, forested hillsides on Java, were Anopheles maculatus and Anopheles balabacensis. Deterioration of vector control activity, followed by a severe economic downturn in 1997, may explain the epidemic. Malaria in the Menoreh Hills and lower Dieng Plateau threatens surrounding areas of rice paddy inhabited by Anopheles aconitus as well as a nearby coastal habitat where the even more efficient vector Anopheles sundaicus occurs in abundance. Most of the 130 million people living on Java never experienced the hyper- and holoendemic malaria that occurred throughout most of the island before the effective DDT spraying and chloroquine treatment campaigns of the 1950s. Reintroduced endemic malaria threatens the island of Java. (U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit # 2, Jakarta, Indonesia)
PANNA summary: Malaria eradication programs in the 1950's failed to remove the disease from rural Thailand, and so the authors want to advise WHO's current "Roll Back Malaria" campaign that only an integrated socio-cultural approach to malaria control in this area will be effective. The real causes of malaria persistence in rural areas, they contend, are poverty and discrimination. The political situation in Southeast Asia has led to a concentration of poor people--indigenous people turned wage laborers, poor farmers, refugees from neighboring countries, and soldiers--on the borders in the forests where malaria has the most potential to spread and health care is the least developed. Traditional systems of knowledge about malaria and its prevention are discredited and ignored. Only an approach that respects traditional knowledge and aims to alleviate poverty and involve communities will be effective.
Abstract: This paper examines the impact of social and cultural factors on malaria control in rural Thailand. It contends that standard vertical malaria control programs tend to ignore local workplace and living conditions instead of recruiting traditional practices into the planning scenario for more effective control. Careful attention to these practices in the context of local economic capacity can serve to offset the common failure to take the major causative factor of poverty into account. (Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University at Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand)
PANNA summary: According to the author, the most likely source of the long-term decline of malaria in North Sulawesi is large-scale conversion of forest to permanent farmland. DDT was being sprayed until the last of the national stock was used up in 1993 after a ban that started in 1990, then other more expensive chemicals were used until about 1997. During that period, malaria rates went down steadily. But in 1997 with the economic downturn in Asia, the government of Indonesia cut back spending on malaria control significantly and since then, malaria has made a small though significant resurgence. The author concludes that it is unlikely for environmental management, bed nets, or anti-malaria medication to be as effective as insecticide spraying in controlling malaria in North Sulawesi.
Abstract: The incidence and impact of malaria in North Sulawesi have declined both in the short term during the 1990s, and over a much longer timespan (though perhaps less continuously) since the end of the colonial period. The improvement already seems to have been well underway before deliberate vector control activities became extensive in the second half of the 1970s, and environmental changes affecting the Anopheles mosquito fauna, in particular the replacement of primary and secondary forest by permanent farmland, are probably the principal reasons for the long-term trend; other possible factors include the increasing use of antimalarial drugs. The well-documented decline in malaria incidence over the years 1991-1997, nevertheless, probably reflects the unprecedented scale of residual insecticide spraying in the province during that period, while the slight resurgence of the disease in the last three years corresponds to the subsequent cessation of house spraying as a result of the current economic crisis. Despite the evident importance of environmental change as a factor ameliorating the malaria situation in the long term, experience from the colonial era suggests that the prospects for deliberate environmental management (species sanitation) as an alternative malaria control strategy are poor. (Royal Institute for Linguistics and Anthropology (KITLV), Leiden, The Netherlands. henley@kitlv.nl)
PANNA summary: India is an important case study to understand that DDT is becoming obsolete, not only owing to concerns over its toxicity, but also because it is losing its effectiveness in treating malaria. India has been manufacturing and using DDT for more than 50 years. Use for agriculture was banned in 1989, and use for malaria has been declining in favor of more multi-sector approaches to the problem, since unsafe levels of DDT are turning up in food supplies and the egg shells of large predatory birds, and its effectiveness is waning anyway. India currently spends 35% of its health budget on malaria control each year. The current strategy is based on prioritizing control in high-risk areas, reducing the use of chemical insecticides, and the prevention and control of epidemics through community participation, the use of bed nets, and early diagnosis and treatment. The use of DDT in urban areas has halted completely.
(no abstract available)
PANNA summary: In a highly endemic region along the forested border between Thailand and Myanmar, the researchers conducted a relatively small-scale (~2300 people) comparative study of the cost-effectiveness of insecticide-treated bed nets and residual indoor spraying of DDT. Calculated on a "per case of malaria prevented" basis, they found that the treated bed nets were more cost-effective than DDT spraying. As DDT spraying is not particularly popular or practical in this region anyway, they recommend that pyrethroid-treated bed nets be used in this region, and considered for other regions in the future.
Abstract: The cost-effectiveness of lambdacyhalothrin-treated nets in comparison with conventional DDT spraying for malaria control among migrant populations was evaluated in a malaria hyperendemic area along the Thai-Myanmar border. Ten hamlets of 243 houses with 948 inhabitants were given only treated nets. Twelve hamlets of 294 houses and 1,315 population were in the DDT area, and another 6 hamlets with 171 houses and 695 inhabitants were in the non-DDT-treated area. The impregnated net program was most cost-effective (US$1.54 per 1 case of prevented malaria). Spraying with DDT was more cost-effective than malaria surveillance alone ($1.87 versus $2.50 per 1 case of prevented malaria). These data suggest that personal protection measures with insecticide-impregnated mosquito net are justified in their use to control malaria in highly malaria-endemic areas in western Thailand. (Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand)
PANNA summary: The author reviews statistics of malaria incidence and control in India. DDT is the insecticide most widely used for malaria control, followed by HCH, malathion, and synthetic pyrethroids, and they are all used for residual indoor spraying in rural areas and anti-larva operations in urban areas. The major vector species has become resistant to DDT and HCH in most of the country. At the same time, malaria rates are increasing in many parts of the country because of man-made environmental changes like irrigation projects and piped-in water supplies—anywhere rapid development is happening, malaria is invading. Indian national and state governments continue to pour resources and energy into the problem, with help from the World Bank.
Abstract: The Indian National Malaria Eradication Programme (NMEP) is reporting 2.5 to 3 million malaria cases, and about 1,000 malaria deaths annually. Malaria in the northeastern states is stable and in the peninsular India unstable. There are six major and three minor malaria vectors, of which Anopheles culicifacies transmits malaria in rural areas and An. stephensi in the towns. Other vectors are of local importance. Plasmodium vivax is the dominant infection and accounts for 60-65% cases whereas P. falciparum contributes 30-35% cases. Field operations to control malaria are impeded by resistance and/or exophilic vector behavior, parasite resistance to antimalarial drugs, operational problems in spraying, failure to search breeding of mosquitoes at weekly intervals, staff shortages and financial constraints. Resurgent malaria invaded new ecotypes created by green revolution, industrial growth and urban development resulting in paradigm shift towards man-made malaria. NMEP has launched a world bank-assisted enhanced malaria control project with primary emphasis to protect 62.2 million high risk population in 7 states. (Malaria Research Centre, Delhi, India. vps@icmrmrc.ren.nic.in)
PANNA summary: Though malaria is currently more prevalent in Africa than Asia, Asia is the epicenter of the multi-drug resistant strain of malaria, P. falciparum, that is currently overtaking much of the tropical world. This is probably due to the huge changes in economics, social and natural environments, and the huge migrations of people that have taken place on the continent over the past few decades. Some nations have come close to complete malaria control, such as China, Thailand, and Malaysia, but fail near national borders, especially those that are forested, as this is where the movement of people in search of economic opportunities has lead to weakness in control. In light of the enormous economic influences on and impacts of malaria, the author asks nations not to keep malaria in the public health sector, but bring its control into the realm of economic planning as well.
Abstract: The documented history of malaria in parts of Asia goes back more than 2,000 years, during which the disease has been a major player on the socioeconomic stage in many nation states as they waxed and waned in power and prosperity. On a much shorter time scale, the last half century has seen in microcosm a history of large fluctuations in endemicity and impact of malaria across the spectrum of rice fields and rain forests, mountains and plains that reflect the vast ecological diversity inhabited by this majority aggregation of mankind. That period has seen some of the most dramatic changes in social and economic structure, in population size, density and mobility, and in political structure in history: all have played a part in the changing face of malaria in this extensive region of the world. While the majority of global malaria cases currently reside in Africa, greater numbers inhabited Asia earlier this century before malaria programs savored significant success, and now Asia harbors a global threat in the form of the epicenter of multidrug resistant Plasmodium falciparum which is gradually encompassing the tropical world. The latter reflects directly the vicissitudes of economic change over recent decades, particularly the mobility of populations in search of commerce, trade and personal fortunes, or caught in the misfortunes of physical conflicts. The period from the 1950s to the 1990s has witnessed near "eradication" followed by resurgence of malaria in Sri Lanka, control and resurgence in India, the influence of war and postwar instability on drug resistance in Cambodia, increase in severe and cerebral malaria in Myanmar during prolonged political turmoil, the essential disappearance of the disease from all but forested border areas of Thailand where it remains for the moment intractable, the basic elimination of vivax malaria from many provinces of central China. Both positive and negative experiences have lessons to teach in the debate between eradication and control as alternative strategies. China has for years held high the goal of "basic elimination", eradication by another name, in sensible semi-defiance of WHO dictates. The Chinese experience makes it clear that, given community organization, exhaustive attention to case detection, management and focus elimination, plus the political will at all levels of society, it is possible both to eliminate malaria from large areas of an expansive nation and to implement surveillance necessary to maintain something approaching eradication status in those areas. But China has not succeeded in the international border regions of the tropical south where unfettered population movement confounds the program. Thailand, Malaysia and to an extent Vietnam have also reached essential elimination in their rice field plains by vigorous vertical programs but fall short at their forested borders. Economics is central to the history of the rise and fall of nations, and to the history of disease in the people who constitute nations. The current love affair with free market economics as the main driving force for advance of national wealth puts severe limitations on the essential involvement of communities in malaria management. The task of malaria control or elimination needs to be clearly related to the basic macroeconomic process that preoccupies governments, not cloistered away in the health sector Historically malaria has had a severe, measurable, negative impact on the productivity of nations. Economic models need rehoning with political aplomb and integrating with technical and demographic strategies. Recent decades in Chinese malaria history carry some lessons that may be relevant in this context. (Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand)
PANNA summary: Malaria fell sharply in India during the malaria eradiation campaign of the 1960s due to DDT spraying, the success of which overshadowed the small successes of other methods. However, malaria resurged following the close out of the eradication program, peaking in 1976. A new government control campaign initiated in 1977 brought the numbers back down, but there has been a plateau since the early 1980s. The effectiveness of residual pesticide spraying was waning. For this reason, environmental management as part of an integrated control strategy has become necessary, and India began to implement it in the 1980s. The scheme includes breeding control by environmental manipulation (filling in small stagnant water holes and creating channels for water to run off) and biological means (introducing larval predators to breeding sites), both of which have been quite effective. Environmental management as a control strategy requires a great deal of scientific understanding and attention, and is not cost effective in sparsely populated areas, but has few of the negative side effects of insecticides.
(no abstract available)
PANNA summary: A brief article on the health effects of pesticide production and use in India, both on people working with those pesticides and on the general population.
(no abstract available)
Malaria Control: Latin AmericaDDT advocates used the 100th Anniversary of Rachel Carson’s birth to trumpet their call for more DDT use and blame Carson for malaria deaths around the world. In the U.S., Carson’s centenary was marked by a flood of pro-DDT postings on conservative blogs and dozens of opinion pieces critical of Carson. Learn more about the "debate" over DDT.
The aggressive advocates who have mounted this pro-DDT campaign are accusing Rachel Carson of causing millions of deaths, calling environmental advocates who support reducing reliance on DDT for malaria control racist, and calling for widespread use of DDT in Africa. Who are they?
Africa Fighting Malaria (AFM): Established in 2000 and based in Washington, D.C. and South Africa, AFM actively promotes the use of DDT for malaria control, lobbying members of Congress and the President's Malaria Initiative to increase funding for Indoor Residual Spraying with DDT. Staff members have current or former links with a range of free-market think tanks critical of environmental regulation, including the Competitive Enterprise Institute, American Enterprise Institute, Institute of Economic Affairs and Tech Central Station. Several of these organizations are outspoken climate change skeptics. 1,2
Roger Bate: Bate is a founding board member of Africa Fighting Malaria, an adjunct fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute and a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. An economist by training, Bate has been deeply involved in anti-regulatory efforts in both the U.S. and Europe. He is a key figure in the "sound science" movement, an industry-funded effort to create the appearance of doubt and debate where there is in fact broad agreement in the scientific community. He founded the European Science and Environment Forum in 1994, which became an important gathering place for global warming skeptics in Europe, and while there published a book questioning the validity of research on the health effects of smoking. He worked as a consultant for the tobacco industry, and in 1998 sought funding from Philip Morris for a "Malaria Strategy," designed to use the issue of DDT and malaria to promote a broader anti-regulatory agenda. Bate has authored numerous articles calling for DDT use to combat malaria, including When Politics Kills: Malaria and the DDT Story published by the Competitive Enterprise Institute. 3,4,5,6
Richard Tren: Tren is co-founder and current director of Africa Fighting Malaria. He is also an analyst for the Free Market Foundation, a research fellow at the Institute for Economic Affairs, and an adjunct fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. He has written numerous articles promoting widespread use of DDT for malaria control and discounting scientific evidence of the human health effects of DDT. During negotiation of the Stockholm Convention, he helped to organize a "Save Children from Malaria" campaign designed to block the addition of DDT to the list of persistent chemicals targeted for global phaseout under the Stockholm Convention. With co-author Roger Bate, he wrote When Politics Kills: Malaria and the DDT Story, which was published in South Africa, the United Kingdom, the U.S. and India. 7
Campaign for Fighting Diseases (CFD): CFD published a report by Roger Bate on Malaria, and ranks donors regarding their malaria control spending with a Malaria Donor Report Card developed with Richard Tren of Africa Fighting Malaria. The organization's web page features articles such as “Anti-DDT Policies are Deadly” and “Pesticides are Good for You.” Henry Miller (see below) is an advisor for CFD. 8,9
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise (CDFE): CDFE is led by Alan Merril Gottlieb and Ron Arnold, who founded the anti-environmental “Wise Use” movement. Arnold was once a consultant for Dow Chemical, as well as head of the Washington State chapter of the American Freedom Coalition, the political arm of the Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church (which has also shared offices with CDFE). In 1991 Arnold told the New York Times, "We [CDFE] created a sector of public opinion that didn't used to exist. No one was aware that environmentalism was a problem until we came along." Prior to their work opposing environmental regulation, CDFE's main focus had been opposing gun controls. According to the article in the Times, Gottlieb shifted the organization's focus when he realized the fundraising potential of opposing environmentalism: "For us, the environmental movement has become the perfect bogeyman." Gottlieb has also said, "Facts don't really matter. In politics, perception is reality." Paul Driessen (see below) is a senior fellow at CDFE, and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death. 10,11
Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI): CEi is a free-market think tank known for, among other things, disputing evidence that human activity is driving climate change. On their website beside a grim photo gallery of malaria victims, the site claims "millions of people around the world suffer the painful and often deadly effects of malaria because one person sounded a false alarm. That person is Rachel Carson." 12
Henry Miller: Miller is an adjunct for the Competitive Enterprise Institute and a Hoover Institution research fellow. He has called for reintroduction of DDT in the U.S. to combat West Nile Virus, as outlined in a recent Wall Street Journal opinion piece, “DDT for Health.” He also wrote the article “While the Government Blunders, West Nile Virus Thrives: How Misguided Bureaucrats and Environmentalists Let a Mosquito-borne Disease Spread” for the Hoover Digest. 13,14,15
Steven Milloy: Milloy is an adjunct analyst for the Competitive Enterprise Institute. He is the "Junk Science" commentator for FoxNews.com, and runs the Web site junkscience.com, which is dedicated to debunking what Milloy labels "faulty scientific data and analysis." He is an outspoken climate change skeptic, and operates the Advancement of Sound Science Center, a group originally funded by Philip Morris to question the dangers of smoking. Milloy's “Junk Science” web site features The Malaria Clock: A Green Eco-Imperialist Legacy of Death, which counts the approximate number of new malaria cases and deaths in the world which could have been prevented by the use of DDT. 16,17
Congress of Racial Equality (CORE): CORE, founded as an advocacy group for African-Americans, played an early leading role in the U.S. civil rights movement. In the late 1960s, CORE moved to the far right of the political spectrum. CORE’s 2005 Martin Luther King celebration honored Green Revolution scientist Norman Borlaug and Karl Rove, George W. Bush’s controversial election strategist. Hugh Grant, Chairman and CEO of Monsanto (the first producer of DDT in the U.S. and one of CORE’s corporate partners) chaired the reception. In 2005 CORE produced a Monsanto-funded video called “Voice from Africa” promoting the use of genetically modified crops in Africa. 18,19,20
Paul Driessen: Driessen is senior policy advisor for CORE and for the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise (see above). Driessen has consulted as senior fellow for several anti-environmental, corporate-funded “think tanks,” including the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow and Frontiers of Freedom. He edited the book Rules for Corporate Warriors and authored Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death, a 2003 book asserting that environmentalists are directly responsible for poverty in developing countries. He has also received funding from ExxonMobil to spin information as a climate change skeptic. Driessen and Niger Innis are listed as directors of the Economic Human Rights Project, '"an initiative of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, in cooperation with the Congress of Racial Equality", which aims to "correct prevalent environmental myths and misguided policies that help perpetuate poverty, misery, disease and early death in developing countries." 21
Fiona Kobusingye-Boynes: Kobusingye-Boynes is the coordinator for the Uganda division of the Congress of Racial Equality. She was quoted saying, "Spraying DDT is like putting a bed net over the entire house, to protect the whole family. Opponents talk constantly about minor, speculative, or imaginary dangers of using DDT." Speaking for all of her country she said, "Ugandans are delighted that DDT is about to return, because they know it will save lives.” 22
Niger Innis: Innis is the national spokesman for CORE. He also serves as an Advisory Committee member for Project 21, an initiative of the National Center for Public Policy Research—a conservative free market foundation with a strongly anti-environmental agenda. He is the son of Roy Innis. 23,24
Roy Innis: A member of CORE since 1963, Innis became national chairman in 1970. In the 1980s he supported Reagan administration policies and was a vocal critic of Jesse Jackson. He is known for controversial stances on racial equality, including hailing as a “bold step” the deportation of 50,000 Asians from Uganda by president Idi Amin in the 1970s. Innis is also a member of the Board of Directors of the National Rifle Association. 25
Bonner Cohen: Cohen is a senior fellow for the National Center for Public Policy Research. He co-founded a website with Steven Milloy and is currently the only board member of Miloy's Advancement of Sound Science Center. Cohen has worked for various industry groups, including tobacco industry efforts to discredit EPA. He is the author of The Green Wave: Environmentalism and Its Consequences, published by the Capital Research Center, which has a chapter critical of Rachel Carson’s push to eliminate DDT. 26,27,28,29
Senator Tom Coburn: A US Senator from Oklahoma, Coburn threatened to block two bills honoring the 100th birthday of Rachel Carson. Coburn called Carson's work "junk science", proclaiming that Silent Spring, "was the catalyst in the deadly worldwide stigmatization against insecticides, especially DDT." He received funding from a board member of the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Don Roberts, a board member of Africa Fighting Malaria, testified to his committee that public health is best protected through the use of pesticides. Coburn also wrote a letter to the European Union urging them to support the use of DDT. 30,31,32,33
This compilation of articles highlights the debate over DDT during and immediately following negotiation of the Stockholm Convention. The Stockholm Convention, an international treaty targeting persistent organic pollutants for global phaseout, allows short term use of DDT for malaria control while countries are shifting to safer alternatives. The treaty specifically calls on the international community to mobilize resources to support effective malaria control programs while reducing reliance on DDT.
1. Malaria Control and Public Health (2004)
2. DDT is still needed for disease control. (2002)DDT’s future under the Stockholm Convention.
3. Malaria, Mosquitoes, and DDT: A toxic war against a global disease. (2002)
4. Politically Incorrect U.N. (2001) Alternatives to DDT can control malaria.
5. The Mosquito Killer: Millions of people owe their lives to Fred Soper - Why isn’t he a hero? (2001)
6. DDT Risk Assessments. (2001) DDT Risk Assessments: Response
7. In praise of DDT. (2001)
8. DDT saves lives. (2000) We can all win.
9. Doctoring malaria, badly: The global campaign to ban DDT. (2000) Commentary: Reduction and elimination of DDT should proceed slowly.
10. DDT house spraying and re-emerging malaria. (2000) How toxic is DDT?
11. Balancing risks on the backs of the poor. (2000)
12. The case for DDT: What do you do when a dreaded environmental pollutant saves lives? (2000)
13. Should DDT be banned by international treaty? (2000)
14. DDT and the global threat of reemerging malaria. (1999) Balancing risks of DDT and malaria in the global POPs treaty. (2000)
1) Roberts, D., C. Curtis, R. Tren, et al. Malaria Control and Public Health . Emerging Infectious Diseases [letter]. 2004; 10(6): 1170-1.
Response: Chen, A., and W. J. Rogan. Malaria Control and Public Health . Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2004; 10(6): 1172.
Available Online at:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol10no6/03-0787_03-1116.htm
PANNA Summary: Roberts et al. refute the arguments Chen and Rogan made in their article “Nonmalarial infant death and DDT use for malaria control,” published in 2003. Roberts et al. claim that Chen and Rogan’s conclusions require “substantial evidence of a causal relationship between DDT and adverse consequences of DDT [indoor residue spraying] for malaria control,” and that no adverse effects on maternal health or infant survival are attributable to DDT. They assert that DDT spraying is still the cheapest, most effective malaria control method. (Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda , Maryland ; droberts@usuhs.mil.)
In response, Chen and Rogan admit that causality has not been demonstrated between DDT and shortened lactation or preterm birth, but claim “the evidence is sufficiently strong that the possibility of causality cannot be dismissed.” They insist that we should proceed with caution regarding the use of DDT because its safety has not been “demonstrated absolutely.” (Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences ( niehs ), Research Triangle Park , North Carolina ; rogan@niehs.nih.gov .)
(no abstracts available)
2) Roberts, D. R. DDT is still needed for disease control. Pesticide Safety News. V. 5, No. 4, 1st trimester 2002. http://www.icps.it/english/bollettino/psn02/05020401.htm
Liroff, R. DDT’s future under the Stockholm Convention. Pesticide Safety News. V. 5, No. 4, 1st trimester 2002. http://www.icps.it/english/bollettino/psn02/05020402.htm
PANNA summary: The closing remarks of two authors after an extended debate in this publication.
Roberts argues that DDT use should not be eliminated under the Stockholm Convention, and its additional reduction should not be a goal. Agricultural use, the main source of DDT that has built up in the environment, has already been eliminated by most nations and is banned under the Stockholm Convention. DDT levels in the environment are already falling and will continue to fall once it is banned for agricultural use worldwide. So, the much less harmful public health uses of DDT should be allowed to continue uninhibited.
Liroff summarizes findings on DDT’s health and environmental impacts since Stockholm treaty negotiations began in 1998, and also indicates successes with alternatives to DDT in Latin American countries. He points out that access to DDT will not be denied outright, and that countries still using it for malaria control will be allowed to continue doing so. However, he argues that the over-arching goal should be a reduction of reliance on DDT and other pesticides for any and all uses, and so efforts should be made toward the development and implementation of less harmful and more integrated alternative approaches to malaria control.
(no abstract available)
3) McGinn, Anne Platt. Malaria, Mosquitoes, and DDT: A toxic war against a global disease. WorldWatch. May/June 2002, pp.16., http://www.worldwatch.org/mag/2002/15-03.html
PANNA summary: A well-balanced article, interesting for its current statistics on the prevalence of malaria worldwide and comparisons with other diseases of global concern like AIDS. Briefly describes malaria—the history of the disease and its phases and symptoms. Includes comments on the Stockholm Convention and a list of the four guiding principles of WHO’s Roll Back Malaria program. McGinn concludes that there is no place for DDT in modern malaria control efforts—it’s simply obsolete, and half a century of experience has shown that there is little justification for its continued use.
(no abstract available)
4) Article: Politically Incorrect U.N. July 12, 2001. Review & Outlook, The Wall Street Journal. available at: http://www.junkscience.com/july01/wsj-UN.htm
Response: Liroff, Rich. Alternatives to DDT can control malaria. July 19, 2001. Letters to the Editor: The Wall Street Journal. Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., p. A23.
PANNA summary: The Wall Street Journal applauds the U.N for its "politically incorrect" stance in the report Making New Technologies Work for Human Development, which supports the use of DDT for malaria control (and criticizes environmental and public health groups concerned about genetically modified foods).
(no abstract available)
Full text of response: Your July 12 editorial "Politically Incorrect U.N." congratulates the U.N. for supporting use of DDT for malaria control. In so doing, the Journal is perpetuating the myth that environmentalists want DDT banned regardless of its usefulness in combating malaria. The World Wildlife Fund supports reduced reliance on DDT for malaria control primarily because of the hazards it poses to human health when it is sprayed indoors and the demonstrated success of alternative approaches. DDT contaminates food and mothers’ milk. Just this week, the British medical journal The Lancet reports that DDE — a breakdown product of DDT — is associated with pre-term deliveries and low birth weights. Mexico and Vietnam are among the countries that have successfully controlled malaria while eliminating DDT, showing the promise of alternative methods. The World Health Organization’s Roll Back Malaria program emphasizes use of bed nets treated with other chemicals. The new Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) — negotiated under U.N. auspices — provides for DDT’s continued use for malaria control, increased investments in and periodic evaluations of alternatives, and the ultimate elimination of DDT when countries are satisfied the alternatives are workable. WWF and the many other environmental and public health organizations who were observers at the treaty negotiations endorse this prudent approach. (Richard A. Liroff, Ph.D, Director, Alternatives to DDT Project, World Wildlife Fund,Washington)
5) Gladwell, Malcolm. The Mosquito Killer: Millions of people owe their lives to Fred Soper - Why isn’t he a hero? The New Yorker: Annals of Public Health. July 2, 2001. pp. 42-51.
PANNA summary: A rich historical piece that brings a unique perspective to the present debates, this article traces the history of DDT’s use for malaria control, with special attention to Fred Soper. Soper worked for the Rockefeller Foundation in the days before the WHO and UN. “With DDT as his weapon, Soper almost saved the world from one of its most lethal afflictions. Had he succeeded, we would not today be writing DDT’s obituary. We would view it in the same heroic light as penicillin and the polio vaccine.” Gladwell traces the history of Soper’s and DDT’s successes and failures, from the discovery of DDT’s miraculous insecticidal capability in the early forties, through the rise and fall of the global malaria eradication campaign of the sixties, which Soper led, to the post-Silent Spring environmentalists’ movement to limit and ban use of DDT.
(no abstract available)
6) Roberts, D.R. DDT Risk Assessments Environmental Health Perspectives, Correspondence. Volume 109, Number 7, July 2001. p. A 302-3.
Liroff, R. DDT Risk Assessments: Response. Environmental Health Perspectives, Correspondence. Volume 109, Number 7, July 2001. p. A 302-3.
PANNA summary: Roberts contends that environmentalists bent on eliminating DDT and its subsequent ban in many countries have caused the resurgence of diseases previously controlled by DDT, as well as diverted research attention and funds from the development of insecticidal methods of disease control into research on the adverse effects of DDT. Roberts in essence blames environmentalists for “spiraling increases in disease rates” he says are preventable by DDT.
Liroff points out that the language of the Stockholm treaty, while recognizing a total elimination of DDT as an end goal, provides for the slow phase-out of the insecticide for vector control. He counters Roberts’ claims by pointing to Roberts’ own history of staunch defense of DDT and downplay of the toxicological risks. Liroff concludes that while DDT is very effective, less risky alternatives should be sought out and used.
Full text: DDT Risk Assessments
Two recent articles in EHP (1,2) and the latest Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry toxicologic profile for DDT (3) make repeated references to DDT risks. These statements of risk, like so many others, are one-sided and give no consideration to colossal increases in diseases previously controlled with DDT. Behind disease statistics are grievous human tragedies, as with the case of a little girl who died of an infection that could have been prevented if her house had been sprayed with DDT. She lived in a village in the Andes and was 8 years old in 1998 when she died of bartonellosis. Bartonellosis was previously controlled through malaria housespray programs, but without DDT, the disease returned.
One-sided and narrowly focused risk assessments form the bedrock of anti-DDT advocacy (4,5), but advocacy for global elimination of DDT through United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) treaty negotiations failed (6). Countries can continue using DDT for disease control, and DDT is not listed for global elimination. This outcome was possible only through efforts of hundreds of scientists on behalf of hundreds of millions of people at risk of illness and death from malaria (7).
Environmental activists who still want DDT eliminated and who are surprised by the lack of cost-effective alternatives should understand that global vilification of DDT eliminated almost all research on public health insecticides. Lack of research support persists and contrasts sharply with the richness of funds for research on adverse health effects of DDT; 29 major projects are presently funded by the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) (3). The evidence of DDT efficacy in controlling diseases is irrefutable. In just 3 years, house spraying in Guyana reduced maternal and infant mortalities by 56% and 39%, respectively, and reduced malaria cases by 99% (8). Similar evidence from other geographic areas persuaded delegates to UNEP treaty negotiations that DDT is still needed. Yet, and in spite of all contrary evidence, the UN program to phase out DDT is unabated (9,10). The current “phase-out” program by the World Health Organization’s Roll Back Malaria initiative and the Global Environment Facility (Washington, DC) includes no publicized disease control performance standards and does not include appropriate on-site studies or tests to determine, under varying epidemiologic and environmental conditions, that DDT alternatives will provide adequate and sustained protection of rural populations.
After years of successful efforts, the modus operandi of DDT elimination remains the same: apply political and economic pressures, convince country politicians that DDT is not needed, pass laws banning its use, and let impoverished rural populations quietly suffer spiraling increases in disease rates (11,12). Even short-term commitments of funds for purchasing the more expensive and less effective DDT alternatives are a continuation of past practices: in the end, disease rates will increase. The Andean girl’s death is one of millions of preventable deaths that occurred as national and international regulations, trade barriers, international policies, and UN resolutions were applied to stop public health uses of DDT (13). With absolute certainty, the best measures of success in the anti-DDT campaign are increases in disease and death from malaria, leishmaniasis, bartonellosis, dengue fever, and dengue hemorrhagic fever. We can add to this list the renewed threat that urban yellow fever will once again ravage populations of the Americas. Even this emerging threat is linked to past failures to continue appropriate public health uses of DDT. The Andean girl’s unrecognized but precious stake in the DDT issue was her life, now lost. How many millions more must die because of hypothetical risks from minute quantities of DDT sprayed on internal house walls? (Donald R. Roberts, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, droberts@usuhs.mil)
Full Text: DDT Risk Assessments: Response
Donald Roberts contends that organizations such as the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) failed in efforts to eliminate DDT under the recently negotiated persistent organic pollutants (POPs) treaty. To the contrary, the WWF strongly supports the treaty’s language on DDT. Throughout the negotiations, the WWF recognized that DDT should not be banned immediately and that uncertainties about the cost and effectiveness of alternatives required flexibility in treaty language (1,2). Reflecting this, the new treaty proclaims ultimate elimination of DDT as a goal while establishing a mechanism for reducing reliance on DDT and promoting alternatives (3). As a result of the treaty, new funds are being provided by the Global Environment Facility to develop malaria control programs that reduce use of DDT.
Roberts has been an outspoken defender of DDT. He has prolifically and passionately downplayed the toxicologic risks of DDT while emphasizing its effectiveness for malaria control (4–6). He frequently argues that external political pressures drive poorer nations to abandon DDT, thereby endangering millions of the world’s most impoverished people. Malaria-endemic countries have had ample scientific justification for seeking alternatives. For example, in the mid-1990s, Mexican public health researchers expressed concern about high human exposures to DDT as a result of malaria control operations (7,8).
Mexico has since eliminated DDT while successfully combating malaria. South Africa also sought to reduce use of DDT in the mid-1990s because of concern about elevated levels in mothers’ milk (9). One species of mosquito was resistant to alternative sprays, so South Africa resumed using DDT. South Africa concluded that the hazards from malaria outweigh those associated with DDT exposure.
South Africa’s experience underscores the importance of the flexibility provided by the POPs treaty. Brazil and India offer important lessons about limits to DDT’s effectiveness. During the late 1980s and early 1990s, malaria rates in Brazil went up even as spraying of houses with DDT increased, but dropped after Brazil shifted strategies (10). With assistance from the World Bank, India is reducing its reliance on DDT. The main rural malaria vector (responsible for 65% of India’s malaria) is resistant to DDT (11). Indian researchers found elevated levels of DDT in buffalo milk, soil, water, and human blood where DDT had been sprayed to control malaria (12,13).
The ATSDR’s 2000 update of its toxicologic profile for DDT/DDE (14) reflects major concerns raised by the WWF and other environmental and public health groups during the POPs negotiations. In contrast to the previous profile published in the early 1990s, the update contains a large section, “Health Effects in Wildlife Potentially Relevant to Human Health,” reminding readers that animals are sentinels for health effects in humans. A new section captioned “Children’s Susceptibility” reiterates a central message from the U.S. National Academy of Sciences’ landmark 1993 report on pesticides in the diets of infants and children (15): children are not little adults, but may be uniquely susceptible and exposed to pesticides. The data in the toxicologic profile support the logic of the POPs treaty: DDT can be valuable for controlling malaria, but it is prudent to reduce human exposures.
Recent studies on humans, too late to be included in the toxicologic profile, further support such caution. For example, Longnecker et al. (16) found that DDE concentrations in mothers are associated with increased risk of pre-term delivery and lowered birth weight. Roberts takes EHP’s contributors to task for their “one-sided” references to DDT’s risks and their failures to account for DDT’s benefits. Roberts’ encomium to DDT is itself one-sided. Why expose humans to hazards from DDT when less risky strategies might be employed? The POPs treaty encourages development of alternatives and provides a new funding mechanism to support malaria control. (Richard A. Liroff, Alternatives to DDT Project, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C., Rich.Liroff@wwfus.org)
7) Attaran, A. In praise of DDT. Pesticide Outlook. June 2001; p. 83.
PANNA summary: The author "argues the case for the retention of DDT in the battle against malaria as the POPs Convention reaches the signing stage." He points to incidences in Africa and Asia where malaria was almost completely under control until the country started phasing out DDT, at which time there were huge rebounds in the numbers of malaria cases. It is, in his eyes, a case of pitting speculative though unproven health risks of DDT as a toxin against the definite health risks of malaria if DDT, the cheapest and still most effective solution, is not used.
(no abstract available)
8) Attaran, Amir. DDT saves lives. The Globe, Canada. December 5, 2000.
Watt-Cloutier, S.; R. Charlie, and J. Crump. We can all win. The Globe, Canada. December 11, 2000.
Attaran, PANNA summary: Attaran targets the Canadian government’s support of the Stockholm Convention on the eve of the Johannesburg meeting in December, 2000. The environmentalists, he says, are being naïve. DDT may kill birds, but it saves people. The amount of DDT used for malaria control has little or no environmental impact compared to the amounts that were being applied for agricultural uses in Rachel Carson’s day, so why make it harder and more expensive for "world’s poorest, most disease-ridden countries to obtain?" Attaran says calling on the precautionary principle in this instance is tantamount to "stepping into speeding traffic as a "precaution" against tripping on a crack in the sidewalk." He scolds the Chretien government for their strong support of global elimination of DDT.
Watt-Cloutier et al, Full Text:
Amir Attaran’s portrayal of Canada’s position on global management of chemicals (DDT Saves Lives – Dec. 5), currently being negotiated in Johannesburg, misrepresents what is going on.
Indigenous peoples from Northern Canada here in Johannesburg are replying not only to defend Canada but also to set the record straight. We do so because Mr. Attaran’s widely reported views sow mistrust between delegations from the developed and developing worlds, thus undermining the efforts of us all to achieve a global convention on 12 persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including DDT.
Mr. Attaran says: "Not only is Environment Canada arguing in the Johannesburg treaty negotiations that DDT should be eliminated once and for all, it has also proposed that the treaty not include a financial aid mechanism to help poor countries finance the alternatives. Canada is alone among wealthy countries in advocating this parsimony. Such policies literally kill."
The government of Canada has pressed for a global POPs convention as have Northern indigenous peoples who have attended all five international negotiating sessions over the last two years. Many POPs used in tropical and temperate countries end up in the Arctic, contaminating the food web and subsequently Inuit and other indigenous peoples who eat traditional food.
When used to control malaria, DDT saves the lives of thousands of people every year. While phasing out the use of DDT is an objective of the international negotiations, nobody supports a ban that puts lives at risk. When this issue surfaced in negotiations in 1999, Canadian indigenous peoples said they would refuse to be party to an agreement that threatened the health of others, notwithstanding the threat of POPs to their own health.
The view of Northern indigenous peoples is also the fundamental position of all countries participating in the negotiations and all non-governmental organizations observing the debate. Any phase-out of DDT will be conditional upon the availability of cost-effective alternatives.
Mr. Attaran’s contention that Canada refuses to help finance the convention including development of alternatives to DDT is demonstrably untrue. The Minister of Finance announced $20 million in his February budget for exactly this purpose. Canada was the first nation to provide such support and is effectively advocating additional financial and technical assistance to developing countries and "economies in transition" (the old Soviet bloc).
A global POPs convention will not be finalized and ratified unless both developing and developed countries conclude that it helps them. There is no alternative to a "win-win" convention, notwithstanding Dr. Attaran’s view from Harvard University. (Sheila Watt-Cloutier, President, Inuit Circumpolar Conference (Canada), Robert Charlie, Council for Yukon First Nations, and John Crump, Executive Director, Canadian Arctic Resources Committee)
9) Attaran, A. and R. Maharaj. Doctoring malaria, badly: The global campaign to ban DDT. British Medical Journal. V 321, 2 December 2000.
Liroff, Rich. Commentary: Reduction and elimination of DDT should proceed slowly. British Medical Journal. V 321, 2 December 2000.
PANNA summary: Attaran and Maharaj argue that attempts to ban DDT are not only naïve, but unethical. DDT is the cheapest and the most effective method of vector control, and no other method has come close—integrated vector management is still being tested and has never been used successfully in a nation-wide program, and other insecticides are often more expensive, less effective, and run into problems of vector resistance. While DDT may be hazardous to human health, there have been no conclusive studies to that effect. The authors find the precautionary principle ridiculous in this instance—removing the best malaria-fighting chemical because it might be carcinogenic, and thereby allowing malaria to spread and take more lives hardly seems cautious. (Center for International Development, Harvard University: amir_attaran@harvard.edu, South Africa Department of Health, Communicable Disease Control)
Liroff’s response addresses the fears of a medical establishment that he feels is unreasonably frightened of the Stockholm Convention. The convention does not ban DDT outright, but provides for its continued use where necessary, and eventual phase out. Liroff cites the US National Academy of Sciences and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry reports to the effect that DDT has adverse effects on the immune, endocrine, and reproductive systems, and that exposure to DDT at certain crucial stages of fetal and/or child development could lead to consequences later in life. While the global burden of malaria is a serious problem, especially on the poorest nations, some countries such as Mexico have had a great deal of success in moving to alternatives, and so it is not unreasonable to expect that a move away from DDT could not only protect human and environmental health but also improve the effectiveness of malaria control. The POPs convention needs to ensure that DDT is still available and affordable to countries that need it, and that supplies are tightly monitored so they cannot be used illegally for agriculture. (World Wildlife Fund, Alternatives to Malaria Project)
(no abstract available)
10) Roberts, D.R.; S. Manguin, and J. Mouchet. DDT house spraying and re-emerging malaria. Lancet 2000; 356: 330-332.
Smith, A. G. How toxic is DDT? Lancet, 22 July 2000. Commentary Volume 356, Number 9226.
PANNA summary: Roberts et.al. highlight the many accomplishments of DDT in malaria control over the last 55 years. A worldwide ban on DDT that would require malaria-endemic nations to reduce house spraying programs, and in turn lead to an increased malaria burden in those countries. Especially now as malaria is on the rise again and re-invading areas where it had previously been eradicated, the authors recommend that “the global response to burgeoning malaria rates should allow for DDT residual house spraying where it is known to be effective and necessary.”
In response to the Roberts, Manguin, and Mouchet article, Smith surveys studies of DDT’s effects on human health and notes that considering the great quantities of DDT that have been used and the depth that the chemical has been studied, relatively few incidences of adverse effects on humans have been found. However, “the perceived rather than the calculated risks from DDT use are an important consideration in maintaining public confidence.” For this reason, Smith advises that DDT use continue to be tightly controlled and effects closely monitored.
(no abstract available)
11) Attaran, A.; D.R. Roberts, C.F. Curtis, and W.L. Kilama. Balancing risks on the backs of the poor. Nature Medicine 2000 Jul; 6(7): 729-31. http://www.malaria.org/attarannaturemed.html
PANNA summary: Attaran, Roberts, et al are quite forceful in presenting their case as to why the Stockholm Convention and "First World Environmentalists" should not continue with their campaign to "reduce and/or eliminate" the use of DDT for malaria control. They argue that studies of the harmful effects of DDT on humans and the environment either are inconclusive, haven’t been replicated, or were due to large scale agricultural use of DDT in the past, while DDT’s effectiveness as a tool for malaria control is undeniable and backed by decades of experience. Environmentalists in industrialized countries have the luxury of placing environmental concerns above poverty alleviation, while developing countries do not have the same luxury. Malaria is one of the major factors keeping underdeveloped nations in poverty, and environmentalists’ attempts to take DDT, the most powerful and effective weapon in the arsenal, away from those nations for their own environmental concerns amounts to eco-imperialism.
Abstract: Malaria kills over one million people, mainly children, in the tropics each year, and DDT remains one of the few affordable, effective tools against the mosquitoes that transmit the disease. Attaran et al. explain that the scientific literature on the need to withdraw DDT is unpersuasive, and the benefits of DDT in saving lives from malaria are well worth the risks. (Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachussetts 02138, USA amir_attaran@harvard.edu)
12) Raloff, Janet. The case for DDT: What do you do when a dreaded an environmental pollutant saves lives? Science News, Vol. 158, No. 1, July 1, 2000, p. 12. http://www.sciencenews.org/20000701/bob8.asp
PANNA summary: Raloff summarizes recent findings and arguments around the push to ban DDT, citing Roberts and Liroff, among others. She finds that arguments for continued use of DDT are very strong—although our eventual goal should be elimination, it would be disastrous to abandon DDT prematurely, and it should be brought back in areas where its decreased use has caused malaria infection rates to surge, especially in Latin America. It would, however, be unwise to rely on only one tool, and so many scientists advocate increased research into the development of new methods as well.
(no abstract available)
13) Curtis, C.F. and J.D. Lines. Should DDT be banned by international treaty? Parasitology Today 2000 Mar; 16(3): 119-21.
Abstract: The insecticide DDT has been an effective and affordable means of malaria control in many countries, but pressure for its use to be banned is mounting. Here, Chris Curtis and Jo Lines take a critical look at evidence that links house spraying by DDT with harm to the environment and human health, and stress the need for resources for alternatives to DDT to be made available to countries that would be affected by a DDT ban. (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK WC1E 7HT. chris.curtis@lshtm.ac.uk)
14) Roberts, D.R. DDT and the global threat of reemerging malaria. Pesticide Safety News, vol. 3 no. 4, December 1999. http://www.icps.it/english/bollettino/psn99/990404.htm
Liroff, R. Balancing risks of DDT and malaria in the global POPs treaty. Pesticide Safety News, vol 4, no 2, June 2000. http://www.icps.it/English/Bollettino/Index-boll.htm
PANNA summary: Roberts argues that DDT has not been convincingly linked to public health problems, and that pressure not to use DDT for malaria control are unwarranted and irresponsible. He challenges the use of Mexico as a model for controlling malaria without DDT, saying that "only time will tell" whether the alternative approaches adopted by the country will be successful in the long run. He highlights data from several countries in South America showing a link between falling DDT use and rising incidence of malaria.
Liroff responds to Roberts’ arguments with information on the current status of the international negotiations on POPs and the case for phasing out DDT. He identifies ways to strengthen malaria control programs, and h argues that the implementation of an effective integrated strategy of malaria control combined with DDT rollbacks would be a "win-win" situation.
(no abstract available)
April 25th is World Malaria Day. In recognition of the toll this devastating disease takes on children and families worldwide, PAN partners are taking action today to promote safe and sustainable malaria control that reduces reliance on pesticides. Please join us.Pesticide Action Network and our partner groups around the world are calling for a redoubling of efforts to control malaria, a deadly disease that devastates communities worldwide, hitting especially hard in Africa. Malaria must be confronted with the best available technologies and solutions. Spraying of DDT inside homes is not such a solution: it puts children’s health at risk, and relying on DDT is not the best way to stop malaria.
In April and May 2007, two events highlighted these concerns:
Africa Malaria Day Briefing, April 24, Washington, D.C.
Malaria-DDT panel at Stockholm Convention COP III, May 1, Dakar, Senegal
Exposure
to DDT is especially dangerous for developing infants and children.
Sound scientific evidence shows low levels of exposure in the womb can
reduce babies’ birth weight, cause developmental delays in children,
interfere with a mother’s ability to breast feed, increase risk of
miscarriage, and cause reproductive problems. DDT has been linked to
low sperm count in men and labeled a possible cancer causing chemical
by international agencies. Some studies show a link to breast cancer.
DDT contamination begins from the moment of its production. Residents
of Eloor, India are protesting the contamination of their homes,
environment and drinking water by a dirty DDT production facility.
Safer Malaria Control Successful community-based programs all over the world are using bed nets, improved sanitation, community education, and tracking and early treatment to address malaria without relying on DDT. For examples, see reports from Kenya, Mexico, the Philippines and Vietnam. These and much more information is available on our DDT/Malaria resource page.
Broadcast Quality MP3
Streaming 24k Internet MP3
Audioport Notice / Overview
Celebrating global attention and support to end malaria
Promoting sustainable malaria solutions
The Honorable John Conyers arranged an Africa Malaria Day Briefing & Reception, April 24th from 3:30 to 5:30 pm. The program started at 3:30 in room 2257 of the Rayburn Building on Capitol Hill.
Special guests available for media interviews and expert comments at the reception: Dr. Paul Saoke, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Kenya (live by phone); Rev. Lois Dejean, Gert Town Revival Initiative, Louisiana; Monique Harden and Nathalie Walker, Advocates for Environmental Human Rights; Shawna Larson, Indigenous Environmental Network/Alaska Community Action on Toxics; Dr. Tyrone Hayes, University of California, Berkeley; Michele Roberts, environmental justice policy expert; Kristin Schafer, Pesticide Action Network North America
View Invitation »
Contact PAN North America for Additional Information »
International POPs Elimination Network and Pesticide Action Network side event: Focusing on health and fighting malaria without DDT: Supporting safe and sustainable strategies. Tuesday 1 May 2007, 1:00pm-2:30pm, Le Méridien President Hotel, Dakar.
Chair: Mme Fatima Dia Touré, Directeur de l'Environnement et des Etablissements Classés du Sénégal.
Panelists include: Dr Jorge Mendez, previously director of the Mexican Malaria Control Programme; Dr Paul Saoke, Director of Physicians for Social Responsibility, Kenya; Crispin Kalumiana Kaposhi, ecotoxicologist, Zambia; Mr Purushan Eloor, a representative of the community living in the shadow of a DDT production plant in India.
A press conference will immediately follow the side event.
View Program »
Contact PAN North America for Additional Information »