PAN Online
Pesticide Poisoning Diagnostic Tool
New Help for Treating
Pesticide Poisonings
by Margaret Reeves
In October 2003, PANNA launched
an important new tool for the diagnosis, treatment and reporting
of pesticide related illness -- an online database with a set
of search capabilities that link pesticides with both symptoms of
exposure and information on how and where pesticides are used within
the U.S. This online tool is a critical resource for health care
professionals in the speedy diagnosis, reporting and treatment of
pesticide poisoning, and is now available on the PAN Pesticide Database
website at http://www.pesticideinfo.org.
Pesticide poisonings
are undercounted
Agricultural workers are
at the greatest risk for pesticide related illness. Unfortunately,
worldwide estimates of the number of workers affected are grossly
inaccurate. In 1990 the United Nations estimated three million farmworkers
were poisoned yearly, based on hospital reports. However, hospital
records do not reveal the true magnitude of the problem for a number
of reasons. To begin with, much of the world's population
and most of the world's poor do not have access to hospitals.
Also, mild or moderate poisoning cases rarely result in hospitalization,
and doctors often do not recognize or report pesticide related illness.
Public health workers surveying
agricultural workers in Asia and Latin America have estimated that
between 2% to 10% of agricultural workers are sickened annually
by pesticides.(1) The International Labor Organization estimates
1.6 billion workers worldwide are engaged in agriculture.(2) Based
on these surveys, somewhere between 32 and 160 million workers are
likely to be poisoned by pesticides each year. However detailed
field observations by public health workers have noted an even higher
incidence of pesticide related illness in Indonesia, where 21% of
pesticide applications were found to result in significant poisoning
symptoms.(3) If similar conditions exist in other countries and
regions, this finding would raise the annual estimate of agricultural
workers poisoned to 320 million each year, a truly staggering public
health problem.
In the U.S., 90,000 pesticide
exposure incidents were reported in 2001 through the Toxic Exposure
Surveillance System, a voluntary reporting system of poison control
centers.(4) Of these, 52% involved children under six years old.
More complete data do not exist for occupational pesticide poisonings,
or for the chemicals involved in acute pesticide poisonings. One
state, California, requires doctors to report occupational pesticide
poisonings and therefore is better able to characterize poisoning
circumstances and outcomes, but studies repeatedly indicate that
many poisonings go unreported because agricultural workers do not
have access to medical care, may avoid treatment for fear of employer
retaliation, and because doctors fail to recognize and/or report
cases. Among U.S. doctors, this failure to recognize and report
results often arises from lack of training, U.S. medical school
curricula devote only about seven hours to environmental medicine
overall, a topic which may or may not include pesticide toxicology.(5)
Pesticide identification
is a problem
When a poisoning incident
occurs identification of the chemical agent involved is the foremost
concern, yet can be quite difficult. The victim may have only partial
information, or not know the chemical or mix of chemicals involved
in his or her exposure. Many poisoning symptoms mimic common diseases
or conditions, which can further complicate the diagnosis.
For all of these reasons,
the new on-line pesticide poisoning diagnostic tool developed by
PAN North America is an important resource. Using a reliable search
mechanism, the PAN Online Pesticide Poisoning Diagnostic Tool assists
health care providers and others to identify poisoning symptoms
of a known chemical, or find the pesticide involved in a poisoning
by entering a crop, type of use, (e.g., insecticide, herbicide,
etc.) or (U.S.) geographic location. A user can also view use and
toxicity information on a specific pesticide or product.
The Diagnostic Tool contains
diagnostic, treatment and related information for 1,900 pesticides,
and provides reporting requirements, instructions and contacts for
all states in the U.S. (and county-specific information for California
and Florida). Because the new tool incorporates extensive U.S. data
on registration and use, the search function is more precise for
locations within the U.S. However, international registration information
is also incorporated, and together with the poisoning symptom and
treatment information, is valuable anywhere pesticide exposures
occur.
In addition to providing
crucial information to doctors when they need it, the diagnostic
tool can be an important resource for documenting the risks agricultural
workers encounter with pesticides. As explained by Marcia Miller,
of the Northwest Regional Primary Care Association, one of the sponsors
of the Diagnostic Tool, "Our ability to advocate for better
pesticide regulation is only as good as our data on pesticide poisoning,
which are incomplete because we, and this includes health care providers,
have limited access to information on diagnosis and an inconsistent
system of tracking."
TESS
Repeat Offenders
The American Association
of Poison Control Centers reports exposure incidents through
the Toxic Exposure Surveillance System (TESS), the only comprehensive
poisoning surveillance database for exposures in the United
States. In 2002, anticoagulant rodenticides were responsible
for the greatest number of exposures, a total of 17,100 cases.
Other pesticides most frequently involved in toxic exposures
were: |
|
|
Pyrethroid
Organophosphate*
Insect Repellent with DEET
Carbamate*
Pyrethrin
Glyphosate
Borate/boric acid |
12,475
8,032
5,321
3,022
4,967
4,472
3,818 |
* Organophosphate
and/or carbamate in combination with other pesticides were responsible
for an additional 2,314 exposure incidents.
Source: Annual Report, 2002, American Association of Poison
Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System (TESS) at
http://www.aapcc.org/2002.htm. |
Margaret Reeves is Senior
Scientist at PANNA.
Note: The PAN Pesticide
Poisoning Diagnostic Tool addresses the symptoms of acute pesticide
poisoning only, and therefore does not provide complete information
on illness or health problems associated with chronic and longer
term exposures to pesticides. Visit the PAN Online Pesticide Poisoning
Diagnostic Tool at: http://www.pesticideinfo.org.
Resources: National
Pesticide Information Center, Oregon State University, http://npic.orst.edu/mcapro/index.html
provides Medical Cases and Topics for Health Care Providers with
information and scenarios of pesticides exposures.
For Illness related
to chronic pesticide exposure see: Agricultural Health Study (AHS)
National Cancer Institute, U.S. http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/press
Environmental Justice
Foundation, London, UK. 2003.What's Your Poison? Health Threats
Posed by Pesticides in Developing Countries; Recognition and Management
of Pesticide Poisonings, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
handbook, 5th edition available in English and Spanish; http://www.eap.gov/pesticides/safety/healthcare/handbook/handbook.htm.
Sources: The Public
Health Impact of Pesticide Use in Agriculture, World Health
Organization and United Nations Environmental Program, Geneva, Switzerland,
1990; Kishi, M, Hilrschorn N, Djadjadisastra M, Satterlee, L, Strowman
S, Dilts, R, Relationship of pesticide spraying to signs and symptoms
in Indonesian farmers. Scandinavian Journal Work Environ Health,
1995.
Notes
- Jeyaratnam, J, et al,
Survey of acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers
in four Asian countries, WHO Bulletin 1987; 65: 525-527;
Condara G, et al. Pesticide poisonings among agricultural workers
in Bolivia, Impact of Pesticide Use on Health in Developing Countries,
Proceedings of a Symposium Held in Ottawa, ON, Canada, September
17-20, 1990, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa,
ON, Canada, 1993: 76-84; Wesseling C, et al. Agricultural pesticide
use in developing countries: health effects and research needs.
International Journal of Health Serv. 1997; 27: 273-308.
- Forastiera Valentina,
"Safe Work: The ILO Programme on Occupational Safety and
Health in Agriculture" International Labor Office, Geneva,
Oct. 1999, on ILO website: http://www.ilo.org.
- Kishi, M, et al. Relationship
of pesticide spraying to signs and symptoms in Indonesian farmers,
Scand Journal of Work Envir Health, 1995: 21:124-33.
- In 2002 a similar number
of calls for poisoning incidents were reported through the TES
System, (96,112 not counting exposures to disinfectants), follow
up of 41% of these reports determined as many as 17,516 cases
with clear poisoning symptoms or signs, and 24,082 with possible
poisoning symptoms, totaling potentially 41,544 cases, Watson
WA, et al, 2002 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison
Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. American
Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2003, 21:353-421.
- According to the National
Environmental Education and Training Foundation (2003), too often
providers are not prepared to respond effectively to pesticide
exposure or illness. A survey of environmental medicine content
in U.S. medical schools found that 75% require only about seven
hours of study over four years (Schenk, et al., 1996)."
|