Contact: Kristin Schafer, PANNA
415-981-6205, ext 323, firstname.lastname@example.org
42 Groups Demand EPA Action on Endosulfan
International panel finds that “global action is warranted” on persistent pesticide
WASHINGTON, DC (December 3, 2009) – A broad coalition of 42 environmental, health, labor, and farming groups today urged EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to finally take action to ban the antiquated insecticide endosulfan.
“It’s time for the U.S. to step up to the plate and get rid of endosulfan,” notes Karl Tupper, Staff Scientist with Pesticide Action Network North America. “EPA’s review of endosulfan has been dragging on for years. Since 2006 they’ve invited some 270 days of public comment on the issue. Meanwhile, the rest of the world is abandoning this old-fashioned poison. EPA action is long overdue.”
The letter from the coalition comes on the heels of the recent conclusion of scientific experts at the Stockholm Convention Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee (POPRC) that endosulfan “is likely, as a result of its long-range environmental transport, to lead to significant adverse human health and environmental effects, such that global action is warranted.”
The POPRC is the panel that evaluates chemicals for listing in the Stockholm Convention, a United Nations treaty that bans dangerous chemicals known as POPs including PCBs, dioxins, and many pesticides. Endosulfan is being considered for addition to the treaty due to the fact that it persists in the environment, is toxic, is transported long distances on wind and water currents, and builds up in the living tissue of animals, including humans.
“Endosulfan is one of the persistent pesticides that threatens the safety of traditional foods and health of Arctic peoples,” says Pamela Miller, Executive Director of Alaska Community Action on Toxics. “ “EPA has a moral obligation to protect the health of Indigenous communities of the north.” Endosulfan has become one of the most abundant pesticides in the Arctic air and is found in wildlife including fish, seals, and beluga whales. Long-term monitoring reveals that levels are not declining in the Arctic and will likely increase as a result of climate warming if actions are not taken to eliminate its use.
“As part of the global community, the US has responsibility to eliminate the use of POPs that travel beyond its borders,” adds Joe DiGangi, Environmental Health Fund. “The consensus of the scientific committee means endosulfan cannot be used safely by any country. It’s time for the US to ban it.”
Among 42 the groups signing onto the letter are Pesticide Action Network North America, Environmental Health Fund, Alaska Community Action on Toxics, Natural Resources Defense Council, Earthjustice, Farmworker Justice, and the United Farm Workers.
Available for Interviews:
• Karl Tupper, Staff Scientist and Coordinator, Environmental Monitoring Program, Pesticide Action Network: (415) 981-1771 ext 314, email@example.com
• Joe DiGangi, PhD, Director, Global Chemical Safety Program, Environmental Health Fund: (312) 566-0985, firstname.lastname@example.org
• Pamela Miller, Executive Director, Alaska Community Action on Toxics: (907) 222-7714, email@example.com
• Letter submitted to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson: http://www.panna.org/files/12-03-09_Endosulfan_letter_to_EPA.pdf
• More information on the POPRC meeting and endosulfan decision: http://www.iisd.ca/chemical/pops/poprc5/
• More information on endosulfan: http://www.panna.org/campaigns/endosulfan