Pesticide Action Network Updates Service (PANUPS)
Action Alert: Canada’s First Province-Wide Ban of Cosmetic Pesticides Threatened Under NAFTA
Quebec’s Minister of the Environment has called for new regulations to reduce pesticide use throughout the province. In July 2002, the Minister presented a new Pest Management Code that includes strict new regulations designed to “progressively institute a decreased and more prudent use and sale of pesticides.” The Code would ban a number of pesticides for non-agricultural uses including the herbicide 2,4-D, and has come under sharp criticism by a group of 2,4-D manufacturers in the U.S. who have threatened to sue the Quebec government under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
The movement to ban the use of pesticides for cosmetic (purely aesthetic) purposes has grown steadily in Canada since June 2001, when Canada’s Supreme Court upheld the 1991 pesticide bylaws of Hudson, Quebec. Hudson is one of nearly 60 Canadian city municipalities that already ban cosmetic lawn pesticides. Many more Canadian cities–including Montreal, Ottawa and Toronto–are also considering bans.
The Code is expected to pass the Quebec government by the end of 2002 and come into effect in early 2003. The Code states that by 2003, synthetic pesticides will be prohibited in all daycare facilities and schools and cosmetic pesticides will be banned from all public land; by 2005, the ban will extend to all private green spaces. Fines will range from CAN$500-$30,000. The ban covers 23 pesticide active ingredients that–according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or World Health Organization (WHO)–are known or possible carcinogens or endocrine disruptors, including lindane, malathion, MCPA, permethrin, benomyl, captan and 2,4-D.
In addition to the ban, the Code will also increase buffer zones around spray applications, outlaw application of mixtures of pesticides and fertilizers, require sale and use permits for pesticide applicators, require golf courses to present pesticide use reduction plans, and provide a list of less-toxic and organic pest control products. The Quebec government also plans to support alternative pest management education for the public and training for pesticide applicators.
One day after the Environment Minister presented the Code, the U.S.-based companies that manufacture 2,4-D threatened to sue under Chapter 11 of NAFTA. Donald Page, spokesman of the Industry Task Force on 2,4-D Research, stated that, “[Quebec is] going to have to stand up in court and prove [that 2,4-D causes cancer].” Page’s group, funded by 2,4-D’s largest manufacturers, Dow Agro-Sciences, BASF, Nufarm and Agro-Gor SA, is spending US$30 million on tests intended to show that 2,4-D is not carcinogenic. The U.S. EPA estimates that at least 58 million pounds of 2,4-D are used in the U.S. each year.
This is not the first time that pesticide manufacturers have threatened to sue a Canadian government under NAFTA for projected profit loss (see PANUPS: Canadian Government Sued for Banning Lindane, January 3, 2002 http://www.panna.org/resources/panups/panup_20020103.dv.html).
However, the Environment Minister seems resolved: “I consider health to be more important than a perfect lawn. I would therefore like to ask Quebecers to avoid using pesticides, or if they need to do so, to use them in ways that respect our health and the environment.” CAP has called for international support for the Quebec government to stand against the pesticide manufactures’ lawsuit under NAFTA.
Minister André Boisclair
Prime Minister Bernard Landry
Mr. Jean Charest
Mr. Mario Dumont
(Please also CC your own government representatives.)
Dear Minister Boisclair,
The announcement that certain pesticides would be banned in Quebec in three years, and that this ban would extend to private properties, sent a wave through Canada and across the world. It is encouraging to note that children will be protected as soon as the Pesticide Management Code is adopted, by banning synthetic pesticides from schools, daycares, public lands. The decision to remove pesticides from the shelves in stores and to have low impact pesticides sold from behind a counter is remarkable. I thank you for this courageous deed that will have generations to come thanking you for your wisdom and foresight. I hope that my government will show that same responsibility towards my family as you have shown all Quebecois! Bravo!
It is not surprising to note that Industry has threatened your government with Chapter 11 of NAFTA. This is a good time to meet the problem head on and get rid of Chapter 11. Thank you for your firm stand against this unwarranted threat. We support you on your upcoming ban in Quebec and your strong position to protect human health.
You have shown that obstacles should not be used as an excuse to do nothing! I hope that my government will have the good sense to follow your lead.
<your name and address>
Contacts: Michel Gaudet or Rohini Peris, Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides (CAP), C.P. 434, Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville, Quebec J3V 5G8, Canada; phone (514) 683-5701; fax (450) 441-2138; email email@example.com; Web site http://www.cap-quebec.com/.
Sources: CAP Press Release: Pesticide Coalition Applauds Quebec’s Move to Ban Pesticides in Urban Areas, July 3, 2002. “Pesticide sparks NAFTA fight” July 5, 2002, The Montreal Gazette. “Quebec to ban cosmetic pesticide use” July 3, 2002, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, http://www.cbc.ca/. Quebec Pesticide Management Code is available at http://www.menv.gouv.qc.ca/.
PANUPS is a weekly email news service providing resource guides and reporting on pesticide issues that don’t always get coverage by the mainstream media. It’s produced by Pesticide Action Network North America, a non-profit and non-governmental organization working to advance sustainable alternatives to pesticides worldwide.
You can join our efforts! We gladly accept donations for our work and all contributions are tax deductible in the United States. Visit http://www.panna.org/donate.