Reclaiming the future of food and farming

Monsanto undermines EPA's scientific review

Pesticide Action Network's picture
Science denied

After halting the process in October, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently put its review of glyphosate back on the calendar for December 13-16. Scientists will gather on behalf of the agency to review the carcinogenic properties of the key ingredient in Monsanto’s flagship herbicide RoundUp.

EPA originally postponed the meeting after Monsanto publicly attempted to discredit participating scientists chosen by the agency. While the Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) will convene next week, it’s notably missing Peter Infante — an expert epidemiologist Monsanto publicly accused of bias.

Caving to industry pressure

A few days before the SAP meeting was supposed to start in October, Monsanto sent a letter to EPA claiming that Infante was “biased” because he had historically defended plaintiffs in chemical exposure cases against Monsanto and affiliated agrichemical corporations — and challenged the legitimacy of industry-funded studies.

Given that Infante is no longer participating in the review process, it seems Monsanto’s tactics to undercut independent, non-industry science were effective.

Scientific integrity?

Glyphosate is the most widely used chemical herbicide in the U.S and scientists around the world continue to raise red flags about its links to cancer. Just last year, the UN’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) determined glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic to humans” — a conclusion they arrived at after reviewing independent, peer-reviewed studies.  

Taking a stand against industry pressure in our environmental regulatory system is critical — and even more so with the incoming administration recently appointing Scott Pruitt, who has clear ties to corporate interests in the fossil fuel industry, to lead EPA.

Join PAN and partners in sending a letter to EPA before the SAP meeting begins next week, demanding the agency keep its glyphosate review on track and take a close look at independent science — even if Monsanto doesn’t like it!

Pesticide Actio...
Share this post: 


JW's picture
JW /
<p>There's something that may not be on your radar, yet.&nbsp; It's called the Human Microbiome.&nbsp;&nbsp; It plays an amazing role in our health.&nbsp; It is currently a very hot area of research in medicine, right now.&nbsp;</p> <p>What is it ?&nbsp; It is this ecosytem of bacteria that we live with.&nbsp; We are actually more bacteria than we are human. (Bacterai cells outnumber human cells). The important thing we are learning is that this microbiome plays such an significant role in our human health.&nbsp; One disease after another is being connected with damage to this ecosystem of bacteria.</p> <p>Gylcophosate, plus it's surfactants, has been found to be killing our good bacteria, while not harming our bad bacteria.&nbsp; This is bad.&nbsp; The average American has already lost 40% of the diversity of this ecosystem.&nbsp; (Greater diversity is associated with better human health).</p> <p>You can read about it here :</p> <p>"Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II :&nbsp; Celiac sprue and gluten intolerance"&nbsp; on the NCBI website.&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>ALL pesticides and herbicides should be tested to see if they harm the human microbiome.&nbsp; This human microbiome is more important to human health than many people realize.&nbsp; Most have never heard about it yet.&nbsp; It's a new, very significant discovery.</p> <p>Some interesting books to get you started :&nbsp; "Missing Microbes" by Dr. Martin Blaser and "The Microbiome Solution" by Dr. Robynne Chutkan.</p>
Pesticide Action Network's picture
Pesticide Action Network
Pesticide Action Network

is dedicated to advancing alternatives to pesticides worldwide. Follow @pesticideaction