seedlings are sitting atop stacks of gold coins against a blurry green background to illustrate the influence that profit has on agriculture
Picture of Pesticide Action Network

Pesticide Action Network

Statement of Civil Society and Indigenous Peoples on the end of the FAO partnership with CropLife International

The following press statement was published by PAN International and is shared with permission.

 

The logos of participating organizations are displayed alongside one another. The full list of organizations is at the end of this statement.

Eleven organizations representing civil society and Indigenous Peoples across the globe welcome the statement by the UN Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO) that it has officially ended its Letter of  Intent (LoI) with pesticide industry lobby group CropLife International. We believe that this is an  important victory especially for farmers, farmworkers and rural communities who suffer most from pesticide harms.

On 15 May 2024, PAN International received written confirmation from FAO Deputy Director-General  Beth Bechdol that the LoI between FAO and CropLife International signed on 2 October 2020 came to an  end almost exactly three years after its agreement. We have been informed that the FAO concluded its  LoI with CropLife on 3 October 2023 in line with a review of all LoIs entered into prior to the  development of FAO’s Strategy for Private Sector Engagement (2021-25) and the related new due  diligence framework.

Since the signing of the LoI, over 430 civil society and Indigenous Peoples’ organizations from  nearly 70 countries, nearly 200,000 individuals from over 107 countries, 250 scientists and academics, nearly 50 philanthropic groups, and the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food have called on the FAO to rescind its agreement with CropLife to Stop the #ToxicAlliance.  

We have called attention to how the agreement tied the FAO directly to the world’s largest manufacturers  of the most deadly pesticides, companies such as Bayer, Syngenta and Corteva. We consistently raised  concerns about the #ToxicAlliance in public and formal communications to the FAO leadership and  Member States, dialogues with FAO officials, as well as global actions.

We believe that such vigilance had a significant impact on how the FAO moved forward with what  CropLife claimed was a “strategic partnership agreement.” In its communications with us in the course of  this campaign, the FAO has maintained that the LoI did not constitute a formal engagement or  partnership, but an “exploratory framework which may, or may not, lead to further engagements.”

We commend the FAO leadership for its decision to not further formalize its engagement or partnership  with CropLife. We welcome and encourage the role the FAO now plays toward delivering on its commitments in the new Global Framework on Chemicals (GFC) and leading the work on implementing  these commitments through the Global Alliance on Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs), in coordination  with WHO and UNEP. The FAO has a golden opportunity to show that it will make substantial progress  on phasing out the most hazardous pesticides known as HHPs worldwide, and supporting the transition  towards sustainable, resilient and equitable production systems under the agroecological paradigm.

We enjoin the FAO to not enter into any future partnership with the pesticide industry, bearing in mind  that its due diligence framework includes specific sets of exclusionary criteria for high-risk sectors and makes clear that the agency must not pursue partnerships with entities that are not in compliance with  human rights obligations or have the potential to negatively impact communities and the environment.

As a UN organization, FAO is obliged to serve the public interest and uphold human rights. Towards that, it must take effective measures to end undue corporate influence on its strategic direction and work, and, among others, provide full transparency about voluntary contributions and about all engagements with the  corporate sector. FAO should expand the scope of the new diligence framework to include clear, accessible and effective accountability mechanisms to address duty of care, grievance, liability, and  remedy.

We remain concerned about the FAO’s continuing informal engagements with CropLife and call for  greater transparency and accountability in this regard. We will continue to monitor FAO’s actions and encourage the FAO to direct its engagements and resources towards phasing out HHPs, reducing reliance  on pesticides, and transitioning to agroecology. To reach these goals, the FAO must strengthen its  collaboration with organizations of small-scale food providers, Indigenous Peoples and civil society.

We sincerely thank all individuals, organizations, Peoples, and other allies who supported the campaign  to Stop the #ToxicAlliance. Let us continue to ensure that our global food systems are not captured by  corporate interests and prioritize human rights and the planet over profit.

Pesticide Action Network International
Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA)
Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
FIAN International
Friends of the Earth International
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP)
International Indian Treaty Council (IITC)
International Pollutants Elimination Network (IPEN)
International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations (IUF)
Public Eye
Third World Network

Picture of Pesticide Action Network

Pesticide Action Network

Pesticide Action Network is dedicated to advancing alternatives to pesticides worldwide. Follow @pesticideaction

Share this post